During the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, researchers published new findings on the use of rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as well as the outcomes of patients who relapse early after treatment with rituximab for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
During the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, researchers published new findings on the use of rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) as well as the outcomes of patients who relapse early after treatment with rituximab for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Rituximab is not currently approved—but is sometimes used off-label—for maintenance therapy in MCL, but this use is not well studied. A systematic review and meta-analysis, published in an abstract, evaluated the outcomes of patients given rituximab maintenance versus patients not given rituximab maintenance, with outcomes of interest including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).1
The researchers assessed 7 studies (including a total of 1050 patients). Three of the studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 were observational studies with comparative arms. Across tstudies, 455 patients received rituximab maintenance and 595 did not.
Overall, rituximab maintenance improved PFS (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50) and OS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83), and these results persisted when assessing only patients treated after autologous stem cell transplantation for both PFS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.25-0.47) and OS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.65).
When restricting the analysis to prospective RCTs, rituximab maintenance improved PFS (HR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34-0.65) but not OS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.46-1.08). Only 2 of the 3 RCTs reported OS, however.
Another study on rituximab discussed the biologic’s use in DLBCL, a disease that has a relapse rate of approximately 40%.2 The study’s authors compared the clinical features and outcomes of patients from the Singapore lymphoma study database who experienced early relapse (within 2 years), late relapse (after 2 years), and continuous complete remission (no relapse after 5 years) following treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy received between 1992 and 2017.
Of 472 total patients, 135 had early relapse, 42 had late relapse, and 295 had continuous complete remission. In the 2 relapse groups, median survival was 1.4 years (range, 1.16-1.83), and 9.86 years (range, 6.86-13.31).
The researchers found that 98% of patients with residual disease at the end of treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy had an early relapse, and the odds of early relapse versus late relapse was higher in patients with high levels of lactate dehydrogenase, more than 1 extranodal site of disease, and stage III or stage IV disease (though age over 60 years or central nervous system involvement were not associated with early relapse).
The researchers say that, even in the era of rituximab, patients with early relapse have worse outcomes, and clinical factors predict these poor outcomes.
References
1. Hilal T, Wang Z, Almader-Douglas D, et al. Rituximab maintenance for mantle cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; Abstract e19557).
2. Koh JJ, Lim ST, Sultana R, et al. Predictors of early vs late diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapses in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(suppl; Abstract e19553).
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.