At the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)’s State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Symposium, held last week in Chicago, Illinois, Judith James, MD, PhD, chair of arthritis and clinical immunology at Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, presented a talk on precision medicine in rheumatology.
At the American College of Rheumatology's (ACR) 2018 State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Symposium, held last week in Chicago, Illinois, Judith James, MD, PhD, chair of arthritis and clinical immunology at Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, presented a talk on precision medicine in rheumatology.
James opened her talk by highlighting the differences between precision medicine and personalized medicine. James explained, “Precision medicine is understanding a disease at a deeper level in order to develop more targeted therapies, while personalized medicine is when therapeutics are synthesized for a specific individual.”
James went on to discuss a few steps toward precision medicine already that exist in rheumatology, such as the following:
“Historically, rheumatologists have the highest number of FDA-approved biomarkers for tests in rheumatology compared to all other medicine specialties,” said James.
Although some forms of precision medicine exist in rheumatology already, there is still a long way to go. “We need better information to help us select the right drug, at the right dose, at the right time, in the right patient, and that will hopefully optimize outcomes.”
In addition, James explained how to optimize biologic drugs’ efficacy in RA, citing different factors and their respective effects on treatment, such as increased body mass index (BMI), smoking, the presence of antibodies, and concurrent methotrexate or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD).
Increased BMI leads to worse outcomes in RA, a problem that can be avoided through diet-induced weight loss of 5% to 10%, which has been found to improve disease activity without needing to increase DMARD dosing. In addition, smoking leads to worse outcomes with increased extra-articular manifestations, as well as adversely affecting anti—tumor necrosis factor therapy. The presence of auto-antibodies is associated with better efficacy of rituximab and abatacept in seropositive disease. Finally, James noted, all biologics perform better when used together with methotrexate.
In closing her talk, James discussed different precision medicine factors currently being investigated for their potential use in rheumatology:
“We’re going to different types of interactions with different kinds of health professionals that we haven’t historically used in rheumatology, like molecular pathologists, genetic counselors, and health coaches,” said James.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.