The American Medical Association (AMA), which is holding its annual meeting this week in Chicago, Illinois, has issued a call for intensified oversight of the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) industry.
The American Medical Association (AMA), which is holding its annual meeting this week in Chicago, Illinois, has issued a call for intensified oversight of the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) industry.
“It’s time to pull back the curtain on pharmacy benefit managers and how their practices negatively impact patients,” said Russell Kridel, MD, a member of the AMA board of trustees, in a statement announcing adoption of the policy. “How is it that PBMs and health plans profit from negotiated discounts on prescription drugs while patients pay co-pays based on high drug list prices that even the plans themselves are not paying? Because of market concentration and lack of transparency, patients and physicians are essentially powerless in the face of PBM pricing and coverage decisions,” he added.
According to the AMA, PBMs have similar roles to insurers, yet face no similar oversight, and are hampering policymakers’ efforts to reduce drug costs with their “byzantine” confidential contracts that drive increased costs for drugs without justification.
The new policy calls for active regulation of PBMs by state departments of insurance, application of rebates to drug prices at the point of sale, efforts to ensure that no patients are discriminated against in benefit design, and increased transparency in how direct and indirect remuneration fees are calculated.
AMA also calls for increased PBM transparency, including disclosure of information on topics like rebates, discounts, and utilization; pharmacy and therapeutics committee information; and formulary information, which AMA says should be made available to patients and prescribers at the point of care.
AMA says that it will develop model legislation addressing state-level regulation of PBMs for policymakers to use.
In addition to its attempt to promote policy solutions, the AMA also seeks to get patients involved; the organization’s new policy is linked with AMA’s TruthinRx campaign, a resource for patients to learn about what influences the price of drugs, how drug prices for products like insulin are increasing over time despite competition, and the role of PBMs in negotiating discounts and rebates with drug makers.
Escaping the Void: All Things Biosimilars With Craig & G
May 4th 2025To close out the Festival of Biologics, Craig Burton and Giuseppe Randazzo from the Association for Accessible Medicines and the Biosimilars Council tackle the current biosimilar landscape and how the industry can emerge from the "biosimilar void."
British Columbia’s Biosimilar Policy Shows No Impact on Hospital Visits
May 28th 2025Despite a dramatic shift toward biosimilar use following British Columbia’s policy, researchers found no rise in hospital visits or complications, underscoring the real-world reliability of etanercept biosimilars in managing inflammatory arthritis.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
What Stands in the Way of Biosimilar Use Across MENA Countries?
May 21st 2025Despite the clear promise of cost savings and expanded access, the path to integrating generics and biosimilars across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is tangled in a web of distrust, inconsistent policies, and deep-rooted cultural preferences for branded drugs.