This week, Amgen announced that the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion recommending a label variation for its reference pegfilgrastim to now include the branded Neulasta Onpro Kit.
This week, Amgen announced that the European Medicines Agency’s (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion recommending a label variation for its reference pegfilgrastim to now include the branded Neulasta Onpro Kit. Following the CHMP positive opinion, the centralized European marketing authorization of reference pegfilgrastim will be updated to include the delivery system of the device in its label.
The Onpro Kit device uses pegfilgrastim in an on-body injector that allows a patient to forego a visit to the physician’s office to receive an injection of the drug.
“The Neulasta Onpro Kit is a showpiece of our patient-centric approach and continued investment in advancing the field of G-CSF administration,” said David M. Reese, MD, senior vice president of translational sciences and oncology at Amgen, in a statement.
The Onpro Kit has been approved in the United States since August 2015, and can be very costly. The eventual introduction of pegfilgrastim biosimilars into the marketplace could provide competition to the reference product due to lower prices, but the convenience provided by the on-body device could help Amgen to retain its market share for the reference drug.
Meanwhile, Gedeon Richter, a German-based pharmaceutical company, announced today that the EMA has accepted its resubmission of a marketing authorization application (MAA) for a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar.
In December 2016, following a meeting with the CHMP, Gedeon Richter withdrew its MAA due to committee concerns that the data provided did not allow for a positive benefit-risk assessment.
Gedeon Richter made the decision to resubmit its application to the EMA after completion of an additional clinical study that provided data demonstrating similarity of both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar and reference Neulasta.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Switching to Rituximab Biosimilars Is Safe, Effective for Patients With Oncohematological Diseases
December 5th 2024Patients with oncohematological diseases switching to rituximab biosimilars experienced similar safety and efficacy, highlighting biosimilars' potential for cost-effective treatment across various medical conditions.