Amgen will await the outcome of its patent litigation with AbbVie before launching Amjevita.
Electing not to follow Pfizer’s lead on its biosimilar infliximab, Amgen will await the outcome of its patent litigation with AbbVie before launching Amjevita, its adalimumab biosimilar. Although it could be available for use once the 180-day notification period expires in late March 2017, Amgen recently acknowledged in a financial conference call, “It’s safe to say that there will be more litigation before launch,” reported Dean Stanton at BioPharma Reporter.
To market before the patent litigation is complete would require Amgen to launch “at risk,” with the significant possibility that if it winds up on the losing side of the courtroom, it would be subject to large financial penalties and product recalls. “Given the pace of that litigation, it is unlikely that this matter will be clarified in time for us to launch in 2017,” said Amgen’s Chief Executive Officer Bob Bradway.
The maze of patents constructed by AbbVie will indeed be difficult to navigate in a relatively short period of time. AbbVie may yet file injunctions against Amgen to further delay any launch plans. AbbVie relies on its originator product Humira for the majority of its revenue, which it has managed to increase 8.2% to $6.4 billion in the third quarter of 2016 (compared with the third quarter of 2015)—but this is assumed to be the result of price increases, not improved utilization.
AbbVie has faced biosimilar competition in other anti-tumor necrosis factor classes in Europe and in other parts of the world, leading its CEO Richard Gonzalez to claim, “Despite increasing competition from new classes of drugs and indirect biosimilar competition in international markets, Humira continues to demonstrate exceptional performance and durability.”
With a greater labyrinth of patents to clear than Pfizer has with infliximab, it is therefore not surprising that Amgen would be less willing to launch their biosimilar “at risk.”
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Pertuzumab Biosimilar Shows Promise in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment
December 9th 2024The proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and safety to reference pertuzumab (Perjeta) in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative early or locally advanced breast cancer, offering a cost-effective alternative with comparable clinical outcomes.
Similar Persistence Rates Between Adalimumab New Starts, Switched Patients
December 7th 2024A French real-world study found that the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 was effective in treating rheumatic or gastrointestinal immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, showing no loss of disease control in switched patients and similar persistence rates between naive and switched groups.