Earlier this month, Biocad obtained a marketing authorization for its rituximab biosimilar in Bolivia and Honduras. The product, USMAL, will be available to patients within months. Yet the Russian firm sees roadblocks ahead for US market entry.
Earlier this month, Biocad obtained a marketing authorization for its rituximab biosimilar in Bolivia and Honduras. The biosimilar product, which will be marketed under the trade name USMAL, will be available to patients within months.
Currently, only reference rituximab treatments (Roche’s Rituxan and MabThera) are available in the Bolivian and Honduran markets. In its official statement, Biocad says that competitive pricing for its product will effectively double the availability of rituximab in the 2 nations. The next step for Biocad’s involvement in the Latin American markets, the company says, is to launch its trastuzumab and bevacizumab biosimilars, already being marketed and distributed in other nations.
Biocad is currently registering its rituximab biosimilar in other countries in the region, and expects to have received 2 more marketing authorizations by the end of the year. The firm has already shipped the rituximab biosimilar to 7 other countries worldwide, including Kazakhstan, Vietnam, and Sri Lanka.
This latest move is a step toward even greater expansion for the Russian biotechnology company; earlier this year, Biocad signaled its intentions to enter the European market through establishing a partnership in Finland. Biocad plans to invest €25 million ($28 million) in Finland’s Turku region over the next 7 years as it continues to develop products for the European market.
With such a focus on global expansion—and a deepening hunger for affordable biologics in the US—Biocad has its eye on FDA approval to gain a share of the US biologics marketplace. Yet, according to Biocad, anti-competitive practices from innovators may put such a potential US market entry in jeopardy. In 2016, Biocad filed a lawsuit against Roche in the federal court in New York, saying that the innovator had attempted to drop its prices for several reference oncology drugs in Russia (purportedly to thwart competition from Biocad’s biosimilar products) while simultaneously raising prices for the same drugs in the United States.
“While Roche and Genentech keep raising prices in the US, they engage in predatory pricing in Russia, where [they] sell such drugs at a loss—all to destroy [Biocad] and prevent it from entering the US market with cheaper biosimilars,” Biocad alleged. Roche, for its part, called the lawsuit “frivolous.”
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.