Celltrion, the sponsor of a biosimilar of Roche’s rituximab (MabThera/Rituxan) approved in the European Union (EU), received approval from the EU’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) to market the drug under 3 more names: Tuxella, Ritemvia, and Blitzima. Celltrion’s rituximab is already marketed in Germany under the name Truxima. Marketing authorizations for some of the names are slightly different; for example, Ritemvia has an indication for chronic lymphocytic leukemia, whereas Blitzima and Tuxella do not have that indication.
The European Commission will decide whether to approve the CHMP’s decision in a few weeks. Truxima is the first Rituxan biosimilar approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the first biosimilar to be approved for a cancer indication. Truxima’s label indicates it can be used for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, in addition to autoimmune disorders.
The action to secure additional names for Truxima generated surprise among some market experts and commentators, and drove speculation about Celltrion’s strategy, which may revolve around generating more total market share through multiple names for the product. Several years ago, Celltrion gained 2 marketing authorizations for its biosimilar to Merck’s infliximab (Remicade) and later sold one of them to Hospira. Celltrion marketed its own product as Remsima, and Hospira marketed its drug as Inflectra. In some markets the competition resulted in biosimilar rituximab selling at a 70% discount to the branded Remicade, eliminating the brand from some Nordic markets where prices were at their lowest.
In the case of its biosimilar rituximab, Celltrion may be setting up the company to have more choices and potentially giving itself the opportunity to give out rights to several different companies, who would compete against each other and maximize market share for Celltrion head of biosimilar rivals. Sandoz recently received a recommendation for approval from the CHMP to market its biosimilar rituximab, creating a likely rival drug launch for rituximab in only a few weeks.
South Korea—based Celltrion has indicated it may apply for FDA approval for rituximab by June 2017. If approved, it would be marketed in the United States by Celltrion’s US commercial partner, Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Rituxan is the world’s second top-selling drug, with sales of more than $7 billion in 2016.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.