Rituximab, which is approved for the treatment of some cancers and inflammatory conditions, also holds significant promise for patients with neurological diseases.
Rituximab, which is approved for the treatment of some cancers and inflammatory conditions, also holds significant promise for patients with neurological diseases.
Long-term rituximab use for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been shown to be safe and well tolerated with recurrent administration, and a 2016 retrospective observational study published in Neurology found that patients with relapsing MS who were treated with rituximab could expect to experience 1 relapse every 23 years. The study’s authors suggested that further investigation of rituximab in patients with MS be given high priority for public funding, given the potential for patient benefit and reduction of high MS-related treatment costs. Rituximab has also been demonstrated to have long-lasting clinical benefits in patients with drug-resistant myasthenia gravis, and researchers have suggested that the drug be repurposed for this underserved patient population.
However, Roche, maker of the reference Rituxan/MabThera, has not sought regulatory approval for the drug’s use in neurology indications, perhaps because of its declining sales in the face of biosimilar competition. In the European Union, where biosimilars are already available, the reference biologic saw its sales decline by 16% last quarter.
As its hold on the rituximab market wanes, Roche has focused its efforts on its newer ocrelizumab (Ocrevus), a therapy much like rituximab, and one which carries a price tag of $65,000 per year. The drug maker gained FDA approval for the therapy in treating both relapsing and primary progressive MS in 2017, but news of ocrelizumab’s approval sparked controversy among clinicians. Annette Langer-Gould, MD, of the Los Angeles Medical Center and a former employee of Roche’s Genentech division, is quoted in Health News Review as saying that ocrelizumab is little more than an “expensive, overdosed version of Rituxan,” and a “fake breakthrough…it’s shameless.”
Roche appears to disagree; on Monday, the drug maker announced that it plans to present “the largest body of Ocrevus data presented at a congress to date” at the Seventh Joint European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) later this month.
Patients with MS who hope for eventual relief from the high cost of treatment may still have some cause for optimism, however, as the market for biosimilar MS treatments appears to be heating up. Biotech companies Abzena and UGA Biopharma have announced the joint development of a cell line expressing a biosimilar to an existing treatment for MS. The company did not disclose the reference product, but said that the originator therapeutic earned $1.9 billion in sales in 2016.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.