Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) specialists from the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization (ECCO) issued a new consensus statement that supports switching patients from Remicade, the reference infliximab medication, to a biosimilar infliximab (in Europe, Inflectra/Remsima, Flixabi).1
The new position statement, issued at the ECCO meeting in Vienna, Austria, in October 2016, represents a significant shift from the group’s 2014 position statement, which acknowledged the potential cost-savings from using biosimilars and the increased access to potentially life-changing medicines, but did not advocate switching. Rather, the 2014 statement said there was a need for caution concerning the use of biosimilars and that switching from the originator infliximab biologic to biosimilars was inappropriate.
The new ECCO consensus statement on biosimilars states that based on the regulatory guidance from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and evidence about the efficacy and safety of biosimilars in IBD patients, ECCO supports switching from the originator biological infliximab to the biosimilar. “When a biosimilar product is registered in the European Union, it is considered to be as efficacious as the reference product when used in accordance with the information provided in the Summary of Product Characteristics,” the statement declares.
According to the updated consensus statement, biosimilarity is more sensitively characterized by suitable in vitro assays than through performing clinical studies. ECCO supports using clinical studies of equivalence in the medication’s “most sensitive” indication to provide a basis for extrapolating its use for other indications, and states that data for the usage of biosimilars in IBD can be extrapolated from another sensitive indication. However, other professional groups of European gastroenterologist—including pediatric specialists in gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition and 2 Spanish medical societies—have issued recommendations expressing concern about extrapolating indications using clinical data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis to patients with IBD.
The consensus statement also points out that adverse events and loss of response due to immunogenicity to a biologic cannot be expected to be overcome with a biosimilar of the same molecule.
The ECCO statement explains that demonstrating the safety of biosimilars requires large observational studies with long-term follow-up in IBD patients. These studies should be supplemented by registries supported by manufacturers, healthcare providers, and patient associations, and traceability should be based on a robust pharmacovigilance system and the manufacturing risk management plan. ECCO’s statement also notes that although switching from the originator to a biosimilar in patients with IBD is acceptable, scientific and clinical evidence is lacking regarding reverse switching, multiple switching, and cross-switching among biosimilars in IBD patients.
Switching from originator to a biosimilar should be performed following an appropriate discussion among physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and patients, and be done according to national recommendations. In particular, ECCO notes that the IBD nurse can play a key role in communicating the importance and equivalence of biosimilar therapy.
Reference
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.