Last week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released a report describing its contributions to science, medicines, and health for the year 2017.
Last week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released a report describing its contributions to science, medicines, and health for the year 2017.
Last year, the EMA recommended a total of 92 medicines for marketing authorization and of these approvals, 35 contained a new active substance.
The number of applications for biosimilar medicines continues to grow year over year, with 17 applications received by the EMA in 2017, compared with 14 in 2016. The EMA also reported that this is the highest number of applications it has received to date in a single year. To date, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use has given positive opinions for 28 biosimilars in the European Union.
Furthermore, the EMA and the European Commission (EC) released an information guide for healthcare professionals on biosimilar medicines in May 2017. The objective of the guide was to provide healthcare professionals with information on both the science and the regulation of biosimilar drugs.
“Promoting innovation and research in medicine development so that patients can benefit from much-needed safe, high-quality and effective medicines is a key priority for the Agency,” said the EMA in its report.
In the United States, the FDA more than doubled the number of drugs it approved in 2017, with 46 novel medicines receiving the green light compared with the year prior. However, it is important to note that the US drug approval tally for 2017 does not include the first of a new wave of cell and gene therapies from companies Novartis, Gilead Sciences, and Spark Therapeutics, which all had drug approvals in 2017 under a separate category.
Over the entire span of the biosimilar approval pathway’s use in the United States, the FDA has approved only 9 biosimilar therapies, with no approvals to date in 2018. In fact, the FDA has issued 4 Complete Response Letters (CRLs) in 2018: Celltrion received CRLs for both its proposed rituximab and trastuzumab biosimilars; Sandoz for its proposed rituximab biosimilar; and Pfizer for its proposed trastuzumab biosimilar.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: Henlius, Organon Updates; Meitheal Portfolio Expansion; Celltrion Zymfentra Data
November 5th 2024Henlius and Organon’s pertuzumab biosimilar met phase 3 goals; Meitheal expanded its US biosimilars; Celltrion’s subcutaneous infliximab (Zymfentra) showed monotherapy could be as effective as combination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.