USV has announced that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has accepted for review its application for a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar.
USV has announced that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has accepted for review its application for a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar.
Express Pharma reports that the Mumbai-based USV hopes to market the pre-filled syringe presentation of its pegfilgrastim biosimilar under the brand name Grasustek.
Prashant Tewari, MD, managing director of USV, told Express Pharma that “We are happy with the acceptance of our [application] by the EMA. USV has achieved a very significant milestone in the development program of Grasustek. We intend to provide high quality, affordable therapy options for cancer patients. We believe that Grasustek has potential life as well as cost-saving benefits for these patients.”
Filing of the application follows USV’s September 2017 announcement that it had successfully completed phase 1 and phase 3 studies on the proposed therapy. The phase 1 study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the biosimilar with the reference Neulasta at both a therapeutic dose and a low dose, and the phase 3 study followed 254 patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to undergo chemotherapy.
USV reports that, in addition to its clinical program to support submission of its application to the EMA, the company has begun planning for phase 1 development in the United States, and has held relevant meetings with the FDA. In India, USV has received approval to initiate phase 3 clinical studies for the proposed product.
USV joins fellow Indian drug maker Biocon in competing to receive the first European authorization for a pegfilgrastim biosimilar; Biocon announced in November 2017 that the EMA had accepted its resubmitted marketing authorization applications for a pegfilgrastim and a trastuzumab candidate (the recently FDA-approved Ogivri). Biocon had previously withdrawn its applications from the EMA to allow for a re-inspection of its manufacturing facility.
USV reports that is also developing biosimilars for somatropin, teriparatide, platelet-derived growth factor, filgrastim, glucagon, and epidermal growth factor.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.