If European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule).
Approximately 1% of the global population has rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and treating RA is costly, especially when biologic drugs are necessary after the failure of small-molecule drugs. A recent study conducted in Poland sought to understand how patients diagnosed with RA progressed through treatments for their disease.
Using the Polish National Health Fund data, researchers identified 1167 patients with RA who began therapy in 2009. The patients, who were followed until 2014, initiated treatment with the following drugs financed under the government’s public payer program: the small-molecule leflunomide (53.6%) and the biologics adalimumab (5.8%), etanercept (14.4%), infliximab (23.1%), and rituximab (3%).
During the first year of treatment, 80.9% of patients continued to receive adalimumab, 85.4% continued to receive etanercept, 84.1% continued to receive infliximab, and 74.9% continued to receive leflunomide. In total, 186 patients (16%) stopped or paused therapy after the first year, and during the 2 following years, 754 patients (65%) did so.
The most therapy changes occurred for patients who had started treatment with infliximab; after year 6, 96% of patients had changed from infliximab to another option. Adalimumab had the second highest frequency of changes, with 85% of patients changing drugs by year 6.
The authors of the study say that, if European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with RA does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule). However, according to their findings, most therapies were continued for 1 year or more before discontinuation. In total, say the authors, between 50% and 70% of the patients followed in this study remained on an RA treatment for an inappropriate length of time.
Reference
Tłustochowicz M, Śliwczyński AM, Brzozowska M, Teter Z, Marczak M. Sequentiality of treatment in the rheumatoid arthritis drug programme in the years 2009-2014. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):569-571. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.58924.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Breaking Barriers in Osteoporosis Care: New Denosumab Biosimilars Wyost, Jubbonti Approved
June 16th 2024In this episode, The Center for Biosimilars® delves into the FDA approval of the first denosumab biosimilars, Wyost and Jubbonti (denosumab-bbdz), and discuss their potential to revolutionize osteoporosis treatment with expert insights from 2 rheumatologists.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.