If European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule).
Approximately 1% of the global population has rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and treating RA is costly, especially when biologic drugs are necessary after the failure of small-molecule drugs. A recent study conducted in Poland sought to understand how patients diagnosed with RA progressed through treatments for their disease.
Using the Polish National Health Fund data, researchers identified 1167 patients with RA who began therapy in 2009. The patients, who were followed until 2014, initiated treatment with the following drugs financed under the government’s public payer program: the small-molecule leflunomide (53.6%) and the biologics adalimumab (5.8%), etanercept (14.4%), infliximab (23.1%), and rituximab (3%).
During the first year of treatment, 80.9% of patients continued to receive adalimumab, 85.4% continued to receive etanercept, 84.1% continued to receive infliximab, and 74.9% continued to receive leflunomide. In total, 186 patients (16%) stopped or paused therapy after the first year, and during the 2 following years, 754 patients (65%) did so.
The most therapy changes occurred for patients who had started treatment with infliximab; after year 6, 96% of patients had changed from infliximab to another option. Adalimumab had the second highest frequency of changes, with 85% of patients changing drugs by year 6.
The authors of the study say that, if European League Against Rheumatism guidelines are followed, when a patient with RA does not reach remission or a state of low disease activity after 6 months of treatment, then the patient’s treatment should be modified regardless of the drug therapy being used (biologic or small molecule). However, according to their findings, most therapies were continued for 1 year or more before discontinuation. In total, say the authors, between 50% and 70% of the patients followed in this study remained on an RA treatment for an inappropriate length of time.
Reference
Tłustochowicz M, Śliwczyński AM, Brzozowska M, Teter Z, Marczak M. Sequentiality of treatment in the rheumatoid arthritis drug programme in the years 2009-2014. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):569-571. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.58924.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.