The FDA has signed a new confidentiality agreement with the European Commission (EC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The agreement will allow the FDA to share with the EC and EMA nonpublic, commercially confidential information (including trade secrets) related to inspections.
The FDA has signed a new confidentiality agreement with the European Commission (EC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The agreement will allow the FDA to share with the EC and EMA nonpublic, commercially confidential information (including trade secrets) related to inspections.
FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, MD, took to Twitter to hail the aggreement, saying that it would lead to more efficient manufacturing site inspections:
The FDA has maintained confidentiality agreements with European regulators since 2003, which have allowed for the exchange of information as part of the regulatory and scientific process. However, the FDA could not, under previous arrangements, share full inspection reports.
The EC’s directorate general certified that neither it nor the EMA would disclose to the public any confidential, personal, law enforcement, national security, or pre-decision information shared in confidence. The European agencies may, however, share information received from the FDA with the regulatory agencies of individual EU member states, but only if those states have made prior arrangements with the FDA. The FDA also assured the European Union’s (EU) agencies that it would take all necessary steps to prevent confidential information from being publicly disclosed.
The new agreement is part of a larger plan regarding mutual recognition of inspections. The plan, designed to reduce duplication of efforts, allows US and EU regulators to rely on one another’s inspection reports on good manufacturing practices in their own territories. As of a March agreement to mutually recognize inspections of manufacturing facilities on both sides of the Atlantic, European inspections of US facilities, and vice versa, are limited to “exceptional circumstances.”
The respective agencies, which have comparable regulatory and procedural frameworks for the inspection of facilities, hope that the overall plan will allow regulators to make better use of their resources. The EU already uses mutual recognition frameworks with other regulatory agencies, such as those located in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Japan, and Switzerland.
In preparation for an agreement with the United States, the EU invited the FDA to observe the EU’s Joint Audit Programme, a framework in which 2 EU member states audit the regulatory agency of another member state. FDA observed the audit of Sweden’s inspectorate by the United Kingdom and Norway, and observed an additional 13 audits before solidifying its own agreement with the EU.
The FDA’s associate commissioner for global regulatory policy, Dara Corrigan, called the March mutual recognition agreement “an important step in working collaboratively and strategically with key partners to help ensure that American patients have access to safe, effective and high-quality drugs.”
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512