Novartis’s generic subsidiary, Sandoz, has delayed its planned aBLA filing with the FDA for its Humira biosimilar of AbbVie’s adalimumab. Sandoz had intended to complete the filing in the last quarter of 2016, but has pushed it to the first half of 2017. Novartis Chief Medical Officer Vasant Narasimhan stated that the delay was necessary based on discussions with the FDA and ongoing capacity upgrades being made at Sandoz’s production site, along with considerations about the timing of required regulatory inspections.
Narasimhan said there are no issues with the clinical data associated with the biosimilar candidate adalimumab; rather, the delay was undertaken to time inspections appropriately for when the company’s facility will be ready for those inspection.
The size and location of the manufacturing upgrades is not clear. Sandoz’s biosimilars manufacturing is managed by Novartis Biologics Technical Development and Manufacturing, and three sites have been used for developing and manufacturing Sandoz biosimilars. Two are in Austria and one is in Slovenia.
To date, the FDA has approved only one adalimumab biosimilar—Amgen’s Amjevita—but that launch is unlikely to occur before 2018 because of AbbVie’s patent lawsuit against Amgen. Humira’s manufacturer, AbbVie, has raised the price of Humira eight times in the past few years, an increase of more than 70% (to approximately $49,000 annually before discounts. According to one analysis, by the end of 2015, a year’s treatment with Humira averaged $27,665 after discounts, up 49% from 3 years earlier—a monthly cost equaling more than many people’s mortgages.
Although the cost of a Humira biosimilar has not yet been determined, based on the costs of other approved biosimilars, the discount can be expected to be 15% of the cost of the reference drug, bringing the cost of adalimumab to about what Humira cost before the price hikes of the last several years took place.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.