The financial plan, which is revised each year, outlines the financial position of the Biosimilar User Fee Act program over the next 5-year authorization period, and explains how the FDA will allocate resources to build its biosimilars review program.
Last week, the FDA released its 5-year financial plans for its User Fee Acts, including the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA), which authorizes the agency to collect fees from applicants for the review of proposed biosimilar products. The financial plan, which is revised each year, outlines the financial position of the BsUFA program over the next 5-year authorization period, and explains how the agency will allocate resources to build its biosimilars review program.
During the first authorization period for BsUFA, the regulatory pathway for biosimilars was relatively new, so much of the FDA’s work on was aimed toward providing development-stage advice to biosimilar product sponsors under its Biosimilar Biological Product Development Program (BDP). FDA says that it received fewer submissions of biosimilars during this period than it had anticipated; it collected more BPD fees than it had planned, but fewer application, establishment, or product fees. This produced a higher carry-over balance at the end of the period than the FDA had projected. However, many of the programs initiated under the first BsUFA period are expected to convert into submissions during the current BsUFA period—which the FDA refers to as BsUFA II—resulting in an increase in the agency’s workload.
During 2018, FDA estimates that it will collect approximately $40 million in user fees, and that it will carry over more than $48 million from the prior year. Its total BsUFA obligations (including administrative costs and agency-wide services) for the year are expected to total approximately $45.5 million.
In the years ahead, FDA plans to adjust the allocation of each type of fee it collects to the total target revenue it expects; this approach should help minimize the variations in the fee amount each year, and will help the agency to comply with the fee rate caps established by Congress. (Fee amounts for future year may not be set at more than 25% above the amounts set in 2018 under current law.)
FDA says that its workload will continue to be near or above its 2017 workload, at least in the early years of this BsUFA reauthorization period. While the agency reports having received only 4 applications for biosimilars prior to 2017, in 2017 alone, it received 12 original applications, and that trend is expected to continue. As FDA ramps up to meet this demand, it plans to hire 15 new staffers for Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Planning for the agency’s financial future is a challenge for FDA, however, given the fact that “It is difficult to predict the amount of non-user fee appropriations that will be approved by Congress which creates financial planning challenges for the program since non-user fee fund levels are often uncertain for much of the fiscal year.” The plan document adds that “This is due to prolonged Continuing Resolutions, versus early in the fiscal year enactment of annual appropriations bills.”
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.