Biosimilar developer Hospira has been ordered to pay Amgen $70 million after a jury found that the drug maker infringed on Amgen’s US Patent Number 5,856,298 (the ‘298 patent), which covers erythropoietin.
Biosimilar developer Hospira has been ordered to pay Amgen $70 million after a jury found that the drug maker infringed on Amgen’s US Patent Number 5,856,298 (the ‘298 patent), which covers erythropoietin.
A federal jury found that Hospira infringed on one of Amgen’s patents for its innovator epoetin alfa (Epogen) when Hospira developed its proposed biosimilar. During the trial, Hospira had claimed that its development of the biosimilar was protected under safe harbor for pharmaceutical product development that would otherwise infringe on patents, but the jury did not find that Hospira had proven that the safe harbor defense applied to the manufacture of multiple batches of the biosimilar. It also found that Hospira had not proven that 2 of the claims of the ‘238 patent were obvious and therefore unpatentable.
The ruling represents yet another setback for Hospira, and parent company Pfizer, with respect to its epoetin biosimilar. In June, the FDA issued a second complete response letter (CRL) for the proposed drug. While the FDA’s first CRL, issued in 2015, indicated a need for additional data, the most recent CRL focused on Hospira’s manufacturing facility. The letter indicated that the agency had continuing concerns about Hospira’s plant in McPherson, Kansas, where the drug was slated to be manufactured. The rejection of the drug came as a surprise to many in the industry, as the FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee had voted 14 to 1 to recommend approval of the drug.
The European Medicines Agency, however, approved the drug for marketing under the brand name Retacrit. In the European Union, the drug is approved to treat anemia in patients who have chronic renal failure, anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy, to increase the amount of blood that patients with moderate anemia can self-donate prior to surgery, and to reduce the need for blood transfusions in patients with anemia who will undergo major bone surgery.
Epogen earned Amgen $1.28 billion in 2016, but steadily increasing competition from biosimilars like Retracrit in the European and international markets has led to declining profits for the innovator developer, which reported a 31% decline in its Epogen sales last year.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
BioRationality: Should mRNA Copies Be Filed as NDAs or Biosimilars?
November 4th 2024The article by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, argues that the FDA’s classification of future copies of messenger RNA (mRNA) products could be reconsidered, suggesting they might be eligible for new drug applications (NDAs) or a hybrid biosimilar category due to their unique characteristics and increasing prevalence.