In November 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held a meeting, comprising industry groups representing generic and brand-name drugs, pharmacies, and pharmacy benefit managers, to discuss possible solutions to increase competition and lower the cost of drugs in the United States. Afterward, numerous stakeholders submitted comment letters to the FTC addressing competition issues.
In November 2017, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) held a meeting, comprising industry groups representing generic and brand-name drugs, pharmacies, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), to discuss possible solutions to increase competition and lower the cost of drugs in the United States. Afterward, numerous stakeholders submitted comment letters to the FTC addressing competition issues.
The Association for Accessible Medicine (AAM), a generic industry group, discussed barriers to industry competition, including delays in approval, the inability to acquire active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), ingredient cost and supply chain fluctuations, a low potential for return on investment driven by consolidation in the wholesale and retail markets for generics, and wide-scale annual price deflation.”
To demonstrate that generics companies are seeing a decline in their bottom line, AAM’s letter stated, “For every $100 spent on dispensing generic medicines in this country, approximately $65 goes to the distribution and reimbursement of those products by the members of the supply chain. PBMs make nearly [3] times as much on generics as they do on brands. Wholesalers make about [8] times more. Pharmacies make more than 10 times for every $100 spent on generics than brands."
Industry group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), offered other opinions on the current system: “More than $140 billion of US brand sales are projected to face generic competition between now and 2021. Competition from biosimilars is estimated to account for $38 billion of the loss in brand spending.”
PhRMA also pointed to middleman PBMs as part of the pricing problem, citing the “change [in] the contractual definition of rebates to exclude certain administrative fees, allowing the PBM to retain these payments rather than passing them back to the plan sponsor.”
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO), the world’s largest trade association representing biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers, and related organizations across the United States and in more than 30 other nations, submitted a letter that commended FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD’s, strides in encouraging competition and addressing drug prices through the Drug Competition Action Plan.
However, BIO also warned that before both the FTC and FDA “embark on a wholly new regulatory approach in this space, we encourage [both the FTC and FDA] to monitor activities currently under way that are designed to speed generic entry and promote efficiencies through market-based mechanisms.”
BIO believes that before considering additional regulatory action in order to promote competitive markets, stakeholders should wait to assess the effects of plan currently in place, as only after these plans are implemented can their impact be fully understood.
In addition to the companies mentioned, comments came in from leaders across the healthcare world, such as the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA), and the American Medical Association (AMA), as well as 318 other organizations.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
The Subcutaneous Revolution: Zymfentra and the Future of IBD Care With Dr Andres Yarur
December 17th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Andres Yarur, MD, a researcher and associate professor of medicine at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, discusses the significance of the FDA approval for Zymfentra, the world's first subcutaneous infliximab product, for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Enhancing Adoption of Infused Biosimilars for a Sustainable Future
October 30th 2024An IQVIA report highlights challenges to the sustainability of infused biosimilars in the US, citing rebate walls and reimbursement policies, and proposes key solutions to enhance adoption and benefits for all stakeholders.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.