Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin) has revolutionized the treatment of diabetic eye disease, and has emerged as an important treatment modality, either as primary or adjuvant therapy for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major driving force in the development of diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Intravitreal injection of the anti-VEFG medication bevacizumab (Avastin) has revolutionized the treatment of diabetic eye disease, and has emerged as an important treatment modality, either as primary or adjuvant therapy for DME and PDR.
The reference Avastin was approved to treat cancer, as was its biosimilar (Mvasi), but its off-label use to treat diabetic retinopathy remains popular and widespread around the world, especially in low-income countries, given its lower cost, perceived effectiveness, and comparable safety profile.
Writing for the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES), J. Fernando Arevalo, MD, and T.Y. Alvin Liu, MD, reviewed 5 years of experience using intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic retinopathy in Latin America and Spain, and conclude that it is an important tool in the armamentarium for treating the complications of diabetic retinopathy.
The researchers add that intravitreal bevacizumab can also be used as a preoperative, adjuvant therapy before vitrectromy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Their study provides one of the longest-term follow-up data sets on the efficacy of the anti-VEGF treatments in DME. The review is published in the December 2017 issue of Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (Philadelphia).
Their study enrolled 201 patients (296 eyes) with center-involving DME and vision loss who were treated monthly with 1.25 mg of intravitreal bevacizumab until edema was stabilized, then returned to clinic and treated on an as-needed regimen, based on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main outcome measures were changes in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) at the 60-month follow-up visit.
The group’s data on preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab suggest that it is beneficial before vitrectomy for PDR, as it tends to decrease intraoperative bleeding, facilitate intraoperative fibroproliferative membrane dissection, and decrease postoperative bleeding. The researchers believe intravitreal bevacizumab before vitrectomy is safe, especially with careful planning and patient selection.
“Based on our experience, we recognize intravitreal bevacizumab to be an important tool in our armamentarium for treating the complications of diabetic retinopathy,” they conclude. “For center-involving DME, our real-world data suggest that there is a roughly 70% chance of stabilized or improved vision with intravitreal bevacizumab treatments over a time course of 5 years,” they write, adding that for PDR, intravitreal bevacizumab is a good adjuvant therapy for patients who have already received prior panretinal photocoagulation treatment. Finally, they conclude that preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab before vitrectromy is safe, with a low incidence of development or progression of tractional retinal detachment.
Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Reduced Efficacy vs Aflibercept in nAMD
April 3rd 2025The ranibizumab biosimilar Ongavia exhibited significantly less improvement in visual acuity and retinal thickness compared with aflibercept (Eylea) in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), highlighting a potential trade-off between economic savings and clinical efficacy.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.