Maryland’s House Bill 631, which is scheduled to take effect in October 2017, is facing a lawsuit filed by the Association for Accessible Medicines, which calls the bill unconstitutional.
Maryland’s House Bill (HB) 631, which is scheduled to take effect in October 2017, is facing a lawsuit filed by the Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM), which calls the bill unconstitutional.
AAM filed suit in a US district court in Maryland in July. The industry trade group says that the bill “grants Maryland unprecedented powers to regulate the national pharmaceutical market, violating the United States Constitution and posing harm to vulnerable patient communities.”
The bill, which targets price gouging (which the bill defines as “an unconscionable increase in the price of a prescription drug”) in the sale of off-patent or generic drugs, requires the Maryland Medical Assistance Program to notify the state’s attorney general of increase in the prices of generic or off-patent treatments, and authorizes the attorney general to:
AAM calls into question the bill’s focus on generic drugs as a way to save health costs for Maryland; according to the group, generic medications, which account for the majority of prescriptions written each year, saved Maryland $4.1 billion in 2016. The bill includes no provisions addressing the cost of patent-protected drugs.
When the Maryland legislature passed the bill, Governor Larry Hogan (R) declined to sign it, but allowed the legislation to pass into law. In a letter to the state’s Speaker of the House, Hogan expressed reservations about the bill, saying that it raised “legal and constitutional concerns,” and that he found it “troubling” that the bill did not target patent-protected drugs or medical devices. Hogan’s letter concluded with a statement that, in his view, the problem of drug pricing can only be addressed at a national or global level, and that state legislation such as HB 631 did not present a solution to the problem.
Maryland’s Attorney General Brian Frosh, however, has been a vocal supporter of HB 631, saying that the law will “give Maryland a necessary tool to combat unjustified and extreme price increases for medicines that have long been on the market and that are essential to our health and well-being.”
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.