Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
Antibodies that deplete B cells, including rituximab, have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of neurological conditions such as progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The efficacy of these treatments hinges on adequate B-cell depletion, but there is a lack of standardization in treatment and monitoring protocols to guide clinical practice.
In order to identify factors that impact repopulation of B cells after depletion therapy in patients with neurological diseases, researchers, reporting their findings in Neurology, Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, analyzed CD19+ B-cell counts in neurology patients who had been treated at least 1 time with a B-cell depleting therapy.
The researchers identified patients in the neurology department of a single center in Germany between 2007 and 2017 and used their anonymized data to determine CD19+ cell counts obtained by flow cytometry.
In total, 45 patients, with a total of 373 observations, were identified. The majority of patients received treatment for MS or NMOSD, although patients with polyneuropathy, myasthenia, cerebral vasculitis, and other diseases were also included. Forty-two patients received rituximab, and another 3 received ocrelizumab as part of a clinical trial program. Most (71.1%) patients received doses adapted to body surface area (375 mg/m2), while the remaining patients received fixed doses.
The researchers found that 37 patients experienced at least 1 event of CD19+ repopulation (CD19+ cells rising to a level above 1% of total CD45+ lymphocytes after depletion). The earliest repopulation occurred after 108 days, and the latest occurred after 554 days. Patients who had higher body surface area (and dosages ranging from 574 mg to 975 mg) had a higher risk of experiencing repopulation than patients with lower body surface area, even when they received an adapted dose (hazard ratio, 1.015 per cm2; P <.05); with every 10-cm2 increase, the time to cell repopulation was reduced by 14 days.
Several patients received more than 1 treatment cycle of rituximab, and 18 patients had sufficient data to compare B-cell repopulation over time in the same patient; the researchers found no clear pattern in B-cell recovery after the first and last treatment.
“It is important to not miss the time point of B-cell repopulation, as this is most likely linked to resurging disease activity, at least in patients with MS and [NMOSD],” write the authors, who note that “monitoring of B cells is recommended with special attendance to [high—body surface area] patients to not miss the early repopulators.” The researchers propose that patients receiving treatment for neurologic diseases be monitored after 2 and 4 months, then biweekly to every 4 weeks thereafter.
Additionally, the researchers say, future investigations of B-cell depleting therapies in neurological diseases should address both dosing protocol and biomarkers beyond CD19+ cells in the peripheral blood; potential biomarkers that could prove useful include memory and effector B cells.
Reference
Ellwardt E, Ellwardt L, Bittner S, Zipp F. Monitoring B-cell repopulation after depletion therapy in neurologic patients. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018;5(4):e463. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000463.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
What AmerisourceBergen's Report Reveals About Payers, Biosimilar Pricing Trends
May 28th 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Tasmina Hydery and Brian Biehn from AmerisourceBergen discussed results from a recent survey, that were also presented at Asembia 2023, diving into the payer perspective on biosimilars and current pricing trends across the US biosimilar industry.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.