A study published yesterday in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology reports that pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical study show similarity between mAbxience’s proposed rituximab biosimilar, RTXM83, and its reference, MabThera, using a population PK model approach.
A study published yesterday in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology reports that pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical study show similarity between mAbxience’s proposed rituximab biosimilar, RTXM83, and its reference, MabThera (also marketed as Ritxuan in the United States), using a population PK model approach.
The study was conducted in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients (n = 251) received intravenous doses of 375 mg/m2 of either the biosimilar candidate plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) (n = 127) or MabThera plus CHOP (n = 124).
PK similarity between the 2 products was assessed by comparing predicted serum concentratoins over time, derived from a population PK model, which “allows the use of sparse data to accurately calculate PK parameters,” according to the authors. Additionally, the schedule of treatment for DLBCL, which includes 6 treatment cycles that include 1 dose of rituximab every 21 days, allows for numerous PK measurements.
The primary PK endpoints of the study were area under the concentration—time curve (AUC) and the maximum serum concentration (Cmax), levels of CD20+ and CD19+ B cells in peripheral blood were assessed for the PD evaluation, and anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were assessed.
The authors report the following:
The authors conclude that RTXM83 and MabThera have similar PK and PD and, to their knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the population PK of a rituximab biosimilar with a large sample size of patients, serum concentration, and multiple cycles of treatment.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Review Confirms Clinical Safety of Sandoz Denosumab Biosimilar vs Originator
December 11th 2024Sandoz's biosimilar denosumab (Jubbonti/Wyost) has demonstrated analytical, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical equivalence to reference denosumab (Prolia/Xgeva), supporting its approval and extrapolation to all approved indications.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.