The FDA has granted approval to a second biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade, Johnson & Johnson). Infliximab-abda (Renflexis), an intravenous infusion developed by Samsung Bioepsis/Merck, has been approved for multiple indications.
This tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor has been indicated for various inflammatory conditions, including Crohn’s disease (adult and pediatric), ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis (combined with methotrexate), ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and plaque psoriasis.
"Once Renflexis hits the market, it will be the first time we will see competition between 2 biosimilars, Inflectra and Renflexis, along with the reference product Remicade," said Brian Lehman, MBA, MHA, RPh, who is a manager of pharmacy benefits and policy in Columbus, Ohio. Lehman, who also serves on the editorial board of The Center for Biosimilars, added that Renflexis offers another important option for patients and providers in the treatment of serious inflammatory diseases.
The most common adverse reactions for infliximab-abda include infections, infusion-related reactions, headache, and abdominal pain, and its use is contraindicated with anakinra or abatacept. The label also indicates that the drug has not been evaluated in children under 6 years diagnosed with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease.
Infliximab-abda will be available in single-dose vials containing 100 mg of lyophilized drug for a final reconstitution volume of 10 mL.
The first biosimilar to infliximab, infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra, Pfizer), was approved in November 2016. While Pfizer struggled for a while falling the launch of the drug, the company’s biosimilar revenues grew by 48% a year later—fourth quarter sales from Inflectra touched $61 million in 2016 (up from $30 million a year ago) despite the fact that the drug is being sold at only a 15% discount to Remicade.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.