The respondents, from 95 countries and with interests in 73 specialties, discussed the performance of top pharmaceutical companies across key factors that influence corporate reputation.
Today, the organization PatientView released the 7th edition of its Corporate Reputation of Pharma report. The report is based on the findings of a survey conducted from November 2017 to February 2018 that explored the views of 1330 patient groups worldwide on the reputation of the pharmaceutical industry.
The respondents, from 95 countries and with interests in 73 specialties, discussed the performance of top pharmaceutical companies across key factors that influence corporate reputation. The factors evaluated in the report included effective patient-centered strategies, providing high-quality patient information, ensuring safety, supplying useful and high-quality products, being transparent about pricing, sharing results of clinical trials, disclosing funding, acting with integrity, and engaging patients, among others.
The report found that 43% of patient groups that responded to the survey thought the pharmaceutical industry had an “excellent” or “good” corporate reputation in 2017, compared with 38% the previous year.
The groups also rated pharma as having improved its performance during 2016 in 3 areas:
However, patients’ view of pharma was more negative in some other key respects. For example, 48% of patient groups surveyed in 2017 believed pharma was “excellent” or “good” at being innovative, which was down from 59% in 2016, and 57% of patient groups saw pharma as “excellent” or “good” at producing high-quality products, which was down from 64% in 2016. Notably, the most recent 2017 data show the lowest-reported percentage of groups who believed in pharma’s ability to manufacture high-quality products since 2011.
The 46 pharmaceutical companies that were evaluated included biosimilar developers Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gedeon Richter, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva, among others.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.