This week, the House of Representatives passed the Medicare Part B Improvement Act, a bipartisan bill that, among other provisions, seeks to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act in order to address the delivery of at-home infusion therapy.
This week, the House of Representatives passed the Medicare Part B Improvement Act, a bipartisan bill that, among other provisions, seeks to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act in order to address the delivery of at-home infusion therapy.
The bill provides for the addition of a temporary home infusion benefit to Medicare, beginning in 2019 and ending in 2021, payment for which would be based on the physician fee schedule. The bill also provides for the following:
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the act would reduce direct spending by $4 million over the 2018 to 2027 period, and would not affect revenues.
Home infusion trade organizations such as the National Home Infusion Association (NHIA) have publicly supported the act—NHIA’s chairman, Varner Richards, PharmD, provided testimony in support of the bill to the Committee on Energy and Commerce last week—and hope that the Senate will follow the House’s lead.
Many clinicians, however, may prove resistant to the idea of administering infused biologics and biosimilars in home settings. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR)’s official position statement, “Patient Safety and Site of Service for Biologics,” says that, because adverse events are not uncommon—and are potentially severe—with infused biologics, such infusions should be administered in a monitored healthcare setting. ACR’s position goes on to say that infusion should be supervised by a provider with appropriate training, nurse practitioners and physician assistants who supervise infusion centers should work with physicians, and no patient should be forced to receive infusions at home for the purpose of lowering healthcare costs.
Despite the act’s move to encourage home infusion for Medicare patients, CMS has simultaneously proposed a cut to reimbursement to home healthcare agencies (HHAs) in the Medicare program. In the agency’s 2018 Home Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update, CMS proposes a cut of 0.4% (an estimated $80 million) in payments to HHAs. Modern Healthcare reports that most of the cuts proposed were initially provided for in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in order to address overpayments for home health services, and that payments to HHAs have seen cuts of $260 million in 2016, $60 million in 2015, and $200 million in 2014. These cuts appear to have prompted more than 900 home health providers to drop from the Medicare rolls in the past 3 years.
CMS also proposes to reimburse for home healthcare in 30-day periods beginning in 2019; currently, Medicare pays for home health services for 60-day periods, which may be renewed if the patient’s physician deems further care necessary.
CMS will receive comments on its proposed changes to home health payments until September 25, 2017.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.