The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that, at present, it will not proceed with its proposal to use biological qualifiers (BQ) to assign international nonproprietary names to biosimilars.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that, at present, it will not proceed with its proposal to use biological qualifiers (BQ) to assign international nonproprietary names to biosimilars.
The announcement was part of an October 2017 WHO publication, “Report on the Expert Consultation on Improving Access to and Use of Similar Biotherapeutic Products,” which covered a May 2017 meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland, to address concerns about improving access to, education about, and the use of biosimilars. The expert consultation was convened by WHO to gather stakeholder opinions regarding policy initiatives, technical requirements for manufacturing, regulatory support tools such as potential BQs, and building trust in biosimilars.
The October report noted that no consensus was reached during the meeting on whether WHO should move forward with the BQ; the system would have been similar to the system used by the FDA, which assigns biosimilars nonproprietary names that have non-meaningful 4-letter suffixes that distinguish them from originator or other biosimilar products. The Biosimilars Council, a trade group for biosimilar manufacturers, praised WHO’s announcement on Twitter, saying that then use of an added identifier for biosimilar drugs would act as an additional barrier to both patient access and cost savings.
At the May meeting, WHO decided to proceed with a separate project, a pilot concerning the prequalification (PQ) of 2 biosimilar cancer therapeutics—rituximab and trastuzumab. The aim of the project is to use 2 assessment pathways for biosimilar applicants: the first based on biosimilars with approvals from a Stringent Regulatory Authority (SRA), and the other a pathway for applicants approved by other national regulatory authorities. WHO will provide clear guidance to manufacturers wishing to apply for the pilot project.
The May meeting also addressed interchangeability of biosimilars with originator biologics, the complexities and diversities of nomenclature, and the principle of biosimilarity. Lessons learned and recent experiences with biosimilars were presented by representatives from Australia, Norway, India, and Brazil. The meeting also included presenters from the pharmaceutical industry, patient groups, and professional societies, who offered a wide range of perspectives on recurrent themes:
In addition to the announcement concerning the BQ and the pilot programs for rituximab and trastuzumab biosimilars, WHO concluded that the organization will review and provide clarification on the organization’s 2009 biosimilar guidelines to reflect technological and analytical advances and experience gained in the following years.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Payer and PBM Policies
November 13th 2024Part 2 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week dives into the complexities of payer and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) policies, how they impact biosimilar accessibility, and how addressing these issues may look under a second Trump term.