The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that, at present, it will not proceed with its proposal to use biological qualifiers (BQ) to assign international nonproprietary names to biosimilars.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that, at present, it will not proceed with its proposal to use biological qualifiers (BQ) to assign international nonproprietary names to biosimilars.
The announcement was part of an October 2017 WHO publication, “Report on the Expert Consultation on Improving Access to and Use of Similar Biotherapeutic Products,” which covered a May 2017 meeting held in Geneva, Switzerland, to address concerns about improving access to, education about, and the use of biosimilars. The expert consultation was convened by WHO to gather stakeholder opinions regarding policy initiatives, technical requirements for manufacturing, regulatory support tools such as potential BQs, and building trust in biosimilars.
The October report noted that no consensus was reached during the meeting on whether WHO should move forward with the BQ; the system would have been similar to the system used by the FDA, which assigns biosimilars nonproprietary names that have non-meaningful 4-letter suffixes that distinguish them from originator or other biosimilar products. The Biosimilars Council, a trade group for biosimilar manufacturers, praised WHO’s announcement on Twitter, saying that then use of an added identifier for biosimilar drugs would act as an additional barrier to both patient access and cost savings.
At the May meeting, WHO decided to proceed with a separate project, a pilot concerning the prequalification (PQ) of 2 biosimilar cancer therapeutics—rituximab and trastuzumab. The aim of the project is to use 2 assessment pathways for biosimilar applicants: the first based on biosimilars with approvals from a Stringent Regulatory Authority (SRA), and the other a pathway for applicants approved by other national regulatory authorities. WHO will provide clear guidance to manufacturers wishing to apply for the pilot project.
The May meeting also addressed interchangeability of biosimilars with originator biologics, the complexities and diversities of nomenclature, and the principle of biosimilarity. Lessons learned and recent experiences with biosimilars were presented by representatives from Australia, Norway, India, and Brazil. The meeting also included presenters from the pharmaceutical industry, patient groups, and professional societies, who offered a wide range of perspectives on recurrent themes:
In addition to the announcement concerning the BQ and the pilot programs for rituximab and trastuzumab biosimilars, WHO concluded that the organization will review and provide clarification on the organization’s 2009 biosimilar guidelines to reflect technological and analytical advances and experience gained in the following years.
FTC Releases Second Report on PBMs Meddling in Generic Drug Markets
January 19th 2025The 3 largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) increased many specialty generic drugs prices by hundreds of percent, with some drugs seeing thousands of percent markups, according to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s second interim report on PBM practices.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Skinny Labeling
January 2nd 2025To close out the year, 4 senators came together to introduce a new bipartisan bill to protect biosimilar and generic drug manufacturers from patent litigation when obtaining “skinny label” approvals for their products.
The Top 5 Most-Read Policy Articles of 2024
December 28th 2024The top biosimilar policy articles of 2024 highlight advancements that include FDA guidance to simplify biosimilar interchangeability and CMS drug price negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act, alongside challenges posed by pharmacy benefit manager rebate practices and the need for more active stakeholder engagement.