Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, from Emory Healthcare and Winship Cancer Institute, explains how stakeholders may view the economic value of biosimilars differently based on their goals and his predictions for how biosimilar utilization will develop in the future.
Transcript
How has the economic value of oncology biosimilars changed over time and how do the economic benefits differ between stakeholders?
Haumschild: I think the economic values continue to grow. We've seen from our European colleagues that they've been able to uptake these medications sooner and really reduce cost. And I think that's what a lot of us are interested in—how do we preserve efficacy and reduce cost? So, I think the economic benefits can continue to grow.
But it is different depending on the different stakeholder. So, from our payer colleagues, they are looking at rebating and getting the total cost of care down on their end by larger rebates and preferencing therapy. Whereas, on the hospital side, we're also looking at uptake of biosimilars to reduce the cost of care and still provide efficacious options. I think it's going to be interesting, though, in the future as more agents come forward, and the rebating continues, and how does that degrade the average sales price for the health systems, where it still provides economic value, and it'll be more interesting of how it impacts reimbursement moving forward.
What utilization trends have you observed and what are your predictions for how the oncology biosimilar space will evolve going forward?
Haumschild: Utilization is continuing to grow. I think that's something that we're excited about. And as we see more therapies come into the market, I think people are starting to recognize that having an adoption strategy is important. I think with that adoption strategy, people are becoming smarter in the way that they're building out their electronic medical records, deciding to designate policies in order to provide a better uptake and faster uptake. And I think at the same time, as payer colleagues are to preference biosimilars, we see it to grow. So, that being said, I know we have a lot of market approvals coming up in the next few years. I personally am really excited, and I think this will, in turn, create larger utilization and cost savings across the country and actually reduce the amount of spend in the US directly related to biosimilars.
Cencora Analysis Shows Differences in Payer Coverage Between G-CSF Biosimilars
May 2nd 2024Data from a Cencora study showed some misalignment in payer coverage of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilars, highlighting that while filgrastim biosimilars are often favored over the originator, reference pegfilgrastim still dominates over its biosimilars.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Eye on Pharma: EU Ustekinumab Approval; New Golimumab Data; Evernorth Adds Humira Biosimilar
April 29th 2024The European Union gained a new ustekinumab biosimilar; Alvotech released positive results from a clinical trial evaluating a golimumab biosimilar and the reference products (Simponi and Simponi Aria), and Evernorth announced that it is set to cover an adalimumab biosimilar at zero cost to patients.