When used as a primary prophylaxis, biosimilar filgrastim (Zarxio) was found to be cost-effective when used to treat patients with nonmetastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a study presented at ASCO20 Virtual, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
For patients with nonmetastatic non—small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are at intermediate-risk of developing febrile neutropenia (FN), biosimilar filgrastim (Zarxio) is cost-effective when used as a primary prophylaxis (PP) when a payer’s willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold is $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, according to a new study.
Findings were presented at ASCO20 Virtual, the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC are at intermediate risk (10%-20%) of developing FN if they are receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
Authors said most patients with NSCLC who receive chemotherapy have ≥1 FN risk factors, and although PP can reduce the incidence of FN, it is more costly than secondary prophylaxis (SP).
The study used a Markov statistical model to evaluate PP versus SP to prevent chemotherapy-induced FN in patients 61 years of age receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.
Investigators conducted separate analyses for patients with 0 FN risk factors and ≥1 FN risk factors, representing 11.3% and 18% baseline FN risk, respectively. They calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and QALY gained from a United States payer perspective.
Cost-Effectiveness for Patients
Use of filgrastim as PP versus SP provided an additional 0.056 QALYs (0.079 LYS) for patients with 0 risk factors, at an incremental cost of $3266. For cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, the ICERs were $46,815, $41,555, and $58,531, respectively.
For patients with 1 or more risk factors for FN, PP versus SP added 0.090 QALYs (0.127 LYS) at an incremental cost of $1605. For cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, the ICERs were $13,970, $12,644, and $17,805, respectively.
Investigators also conducted deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, finding that the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a WTP threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 31.7% for patients with 0 risk factors for FN and 96.6% for those with at least 1 FN risk factor.
Reference
Li EC, Mezzio D, Spargo K, Campbell KJ, Lyman GH. Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at intermediate risk. Presented at ASCO20 Virtual; May 30-31, 2020. Abstract e19401
A Banner Year for Biosimilars: The 19 FDA Approvals From 2024
January 21st 2025In 2024, the FDA approved 19 biosimilars across various therapeutic areas, including the first biosimilars for ustekinumab and denosumab, marking significant progress in expanding treatment options and market competition.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
The Next Frontier: Oncology Biosimilars in 2025 and Beyond
January 13th 2025The US oncology biosimilar market has rapidly evolved since its launch in 2017, driven by steep price discounts, payer adoption, and provider confidence, with an upcoming wave of biosimilars targeting blockbuster biologics promising further market growth, cost savings, and broader patient access.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
The Top 5 Most-Read Conference Articles of 2024
December 26th 2024The top 5 biosimilar conference articles in 2024 highlight significant progress in the biosimilar landscape, including strategies for market sustainability, safety of switching to biosimilars, and substantial savings through high biosimilar adoption, while also addressing ongoing challenges.
Top 5 Most-Read Oncology Articles of 2024
December 24th 2024The top 5 oncology biosimilar articles in 2024 cover Duke's recommendations for cell and gene therapy biosimilars, FDA approval of Shanghai Henlius Biotech's trastuzumab biosimilar, Boehringer Ingelheim layoffs, the safety of rituximab biosimilar CT-P10, and more.