The researchers concluded that the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-05280586 and the reference were similar at the conclusion of the study at week 26.
In a study to be presented at the American Society of Hematology’s annual meeting held in San Diego, California from December 1-4, 2018, researchers evaluated PF-05280586, a proposed rituximab biosimilar, versus the EU-licensed reference product, MabThera, in patients with previously untreated CD20-positive, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma.
"If approved this may help provide a more cost-effective treatment option and expand access for patients and physicians," said Jeff Sharman, MD, medical director, US Oncology Hematology Research.
The 52-week comparative study investigated the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of PF-05280586 compared with the reference. In total, 394 patients enrolled in the study and were randomized to receive either PF-05280586 (n = 196) or the reference (n = 198).
The primary end point of the study was overall response rate (ORR) at week 26, defined as the percentage of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on central review. Secondary end points included progression free survival, safety, immunogenicity, PK and PD.
Overall, the study found that ORR at week 26 was 75.5% in the PF-05280586 arm, compared with 70.7% in the reference arm, for a difference of 4.66%. The corresponding 95% CI, —4.16 to 13.47, was within the prespecified equivalence margin of ±16%.
At week 26, 11.5% of patients in the potential biosimilar arm had stable disease, compared with 19.6% in the reference. Additionally, 3.4% versus 4.3% had progressive disease in the PF-05280586 group versus the reference group, respectively.
The researchers found that the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar, with 78.6% for PF-05280586 versus 72.1% for the reference. The most frequently reported TEAEs were infusion-related reactions (25.5% versus 29.9%), pruritus (6.6% versus 11.2%), and headache (8.2% versus 9.6%) in the PF-05280586 and the reference groups, respectively.
The most frequently reported grade 3 TEAEs were infusion-related reactions and hypertension, seen in 2.6% versus 0.5% and 1.0% versus 2.0% in the PF-05280586 group versus the reference group.
The researchers concluded that the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PF-05280586 and the reference were similar at the conclusion of the study at week 26.
"With a patient centered approach and over a decade of experience globally. Pfizer remains dedicated to developing and delivering high quality biosimilars with similar efficacy and safety profiles to originator medicines that help have a meaningful impact on people living with various conditions including cancer," said Joe McClellan, vice president of biosimilars development at Pfizer, in announcing the results.
Reference
Sharman J, Liberati A, Silva R, et al. A randomized, double-blind efficacy and safety study of PF-05280586 (a potential rituximab biosimilar) compared with rituximab reference product (MabThera®) in subjects with previously untreated CD20-positive, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (LTB-FL). Presented at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, December 1-4, 2018; San Diego, California. Abstract 394. ash.confex.com/ash/2018/webprogram/Paper111248.html.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
Panelists Stress Stakeholder Education to Build Confidence in Biosimilars
October 31st 2024By expanding educational initiatives to clarify biosimilar safety, efficacy, and interchangeability, stakeholders can foster trust, improve access, and ensure that biosimilars are widely accepted as high-quality, cost-effective alternatives to originator biologics.
Insights from Festival of Biologics: Dracey Poore Discusses Cardinal Health’s 2024 Biosimilar Report
May 19th 2024The discussion highlights key emerging trends from the Festival of Biologics conference and the annual Cardinal Health Biosimilars Report, including the importance of sustainability in the health care landscape and the challenges and successes in biosimilar adoption and affordability.
Strengthening the Supply Chain: Key Insights From FDA Commissioner Dr Robert Califf
October 25th 2024At the GRx+Biosims conference, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, stressed the urgent need for data transparency in the global supply chain and the role of collaboration and artificial intelligence in ensuring the resilience of biosimilar and generic drug production.
FDA and Industry Experts Unpack Biosimilar Device Requirements
October 23rd 2024At the GRx+Biosims 2024 conference, a panel of industry experts and FDA officials discussed evolving device requirements for biosimilars and interchangeable biosimilars, highlighting new approaches to comparative use human factors studies, regulatory challenges, and alternative validation methods.