CMS established a lower maximum copay for biosimilar and interchangeable biological products that is equivalent to the lower co-pay required for generic and preferred multiple source drugs.
In November 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule that included the proposal to lower cost sharing for and improve enrollee incentives to choose biosimilars over reference biologics, and to reduce costs to both Medicare Part D enrollees and the Part D program. This objective would have been accomplished by revising the definition of generic drug (§ 423.4) to include follow-on biologic products approved under the section 351(k) biosimilar pathway. This change would impact Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) cost sharing and non-LIS catastrophic coverage phase cost sharing, and would not be universally applied across other CMS policy.
In April 2018, CMS finalized the proposal to allow biosimilars to be covered at the generic copayment level for LIS-eligible beneficiaries and therefore achieve the intent of the original proposal. CMS did not revise the definition of generic drugs because their proposed approach "could be misinterpreted and create further confusion about the broader treatment of biosimilar and interchangeable biological products under the Part D program." But, instead, CMS established a lower maximum copay for biosimilar and interchangeable biological products that is equivalent to the lower co-pay required for generic and preferred multiple source drugs (revising § 423.782(a)(2)(iii)(A) and § 423.782(b)(3)) and will have the following impacts in 2019:
Institutionalized dual-eligible or receiving home- and community-based services:
Dual eligible, below or at 100% of the Federal Poverty Limit (FPL):
Dual eligible, above 100% FPL or Medicare-only below 135% FPL:
Medicare-only, between 135% and 150% FPL
The final rule did not change the cost sharing for biosimilar drugs to the same level as generic drugs for non-LIS beneficiaries in the catastrophic coverage phase. Under the new approach, the one that does not revise the definition of generic drug, CMS did not have the flexibility within statue to establish a lower copay.
The good news is that this change will not have a negative impact on non-LIS cost sharing in the catastrophic phase because such enrollees are required to pay cost sharing that is equal to the greater of the applicable copay amount ($3.40 for generic drugs or $8.50 for other products including biosimilars in 2019) or 5%. Given the high cost of biological products in general, the non-LIS catastrophic cost sharing will almost certainly be 5%.
The Top 5 Most-Read Gastroenterology Articles of 2024
December 21st 2024The top gastroenterology biosimilar news from 2024 highlight fluctuations in the adalimumab biosimilar market throughout the year, while FDA and European approvals for ustekinumab biosimilars are set to improve access and reduce costs for patients with Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup for November 2024—Podcast Edition
December 1st 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss market changes in the adalimumab space; calls for PBM transparency and biosimilar access reforms grew; new data for biosimilars in gastroenterology conditions; and all the takeaways from this year's Global Biosimilars Week.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.