To the Editor,
I read with interest your article entitled “Panel Grapples With the Role of Biosimilars in Oncology” that reported on The Atlantic’s panel discussion of June 1, 2018, on the role that biosimilars will play in cancer care.
Although you accurately reported comments from Mr. Andrew Spiegel of the Global Colon Cancer Association, I am concerned that some of his statements will perpetuate misconceptions about biosimilars. Mr. Spiegel stated that the European experience with biosimilars was inadequate because the European health authorities did not require pharmacovigilance reporting with the same rigor as required in the United States, suggesting that we do not have convincing data supporting the post-approval safety profile of biosimilars marketed in Europe.
These assertions are far from the truth.
There are many European Union member countries with sizable populations that have advanced pharmacovigilance systems that are as excellent as any pharmacovigilance system in the world.
Ever since the approval of Omnitrope (somatropin) in Europe in 2006 as the world’s first biosimilar, EU health authorities have subjected all EU-approved biosimilars to the very same pharmacovigilance reporting standards, post-approval studies and periodic re-analyses of benefit-risk profile as any other newly approved biological drug.
Based on the extensive and well-executed pharmacovigilance reporting associated with 700 million patient-days of exposure to biosimilars in the European Union,1 the European Medicines Agency (EMA) concluded in 2017 that “The EU monitoring system for safety concerns has not identified any relevant difference in the nature, severity or frequency of adverse effects between biosimilar medicines and their reference medicines.”2
Healthcare professionals and the public in the United States can be reassured: well-designed biosimilars approved to the standards of the FDA and EMA are as safe and effective for their intended use as their respective reference medicines.
References
1. Biosimilar Medicines Group, a Medicines for Europe sector group. Comment on the Food and Drug Administration Notice: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting (Docket FDA-2017-N-2732). Regulations.gov. https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FDA-2017-N-2732-0006. Published June 26, 2017. Accessed June 7, 2018.
2. European Medicines Agency. Biosimilars in the EU: Information guide for healthcare professionals. European Medicines Agency website. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Leaflet/2017/05/WC500226648.pdf. Published April 27, 2017. Accessed June 4, 2018.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.