Increasing trust in generics and biosimilars, and assuring their timely entry into the market, will yield greater benefit from these lower-cost options, according to a recent review.
Improving access to fairly priced, quality-assured generics and biosimilars is essential to realizing the potential public health and cost-saving benefits of these drugs, according to an editorial published in The BMJ, which also lays out strategies to achieve this goal.
In the publication, the authors point out that achieving universal health coverage requires universal access to safe, effective, quality-assured, and affordable drugs and vaccines, and they highlight the role of generics and biosimilars. The authors cite increasing trust in generics and biosimilars, as well as incentivizing the use of these lower-cost options, as needed improvements. However, they also acknowledge biosimilars have not realized the cost advantages currently associated with generics, at least in part due to the complex production processes and more extensive regulatory requirements biosimilars need for approval compared with generics.
The authors review the research on how policies used by health authorities aimed at reducing prices have worked thus far:
Internal reference pricing: Establishing groups of interchangeable drugs, each with a single reimbursement price, was found to decrease spending by leading patients to options at or below the reimbursement price. However, after the reimbursement price has been set, there is little incentive for manufacturers to drive prices below that point, which could limit potential cost savings.
Basing generic/biosimilar price on a percentage of the originator price: Similar to internal reference pricing, a fixed discount could discourage price competition. Plus, the price of the originator has a large influence on how well this policy works, the authors say.
Nonproprietary prescribing and generic substitution: The authors note that countries with mandatory generic prescribing or a high prevalence of generic prescriptions see substantial cost savings and that generics entered the market earlier in countries with mandatory generic prescribing.
Where nonproprietary prescribing is not mandatory, prescriber or patient perceptions about the quality of the generic compared with the originator may limit the utilization of generics. The authors suggest, at minimum, voluntary implementation of these policies where it is not feasible to make them mandatory.
For biosimilars, the situation is more complex since they are, by definition, “highly similar” as opposed to identical. Although biosimilars must establish no clinically meaningful differences from the originator before approval, the authors note the issue of switching patients to a biosimilar from their current reference product remains “the subject of debate.”
Tendering and pooled procurement: Generic prices can be reduced by pooling procurement. Tendering, in which suppliers must compete for contracts, has also been widely and successfully used to reduce prices; however, this can also drive small suppliers from the market, leading to decreased competition.
The authors conclude by stating that increasing trust in generics and biosimilars, and assuring their timely entry into the market, will yield greater benefit from these lower-cost options. Further, they note that efforts from all stakeholders are necessary ,as no single policy will achieve this goal.
For example, the authors recommend that governments carefully review pricing policies and grant priority review to the first generic, that payers provide incentives for pharmacists to dispense generics and biosimilars, that pharmaceutical companies either grant or take advantage of voluntary licensing, that physicians seek out evidence-based and independent information and prescribe the most cost-effective treatment, that physicians be involved in “switch studies,” and that government, physicians, and prescribers all help to educate patients about the safety and efficacy of generics and biosimilars.
Reference
Ferrario A, Dedet G, Humbert T, Vogler S, Suleman F, Pedersen HB. Strategies to achieve fairer prices for generic and biosimilar medicines. BMJ. 2020;368:l5444. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5444.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512