The American Medical Association (AMA), which is holding its annual meeting this week in Chicago, Illinois, has issued a call for intensified oversight of the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) industry.
The American Medical Association (AMA), which is holding its annual meeting this week in Chicago, Illinois, has issued a call for intensified oversight of the pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) industry.
“It’s time to pull back the curtain on pharmacy benefit managers and how their practices negatively impact patients,” said Russell Kridel, MD, a member of the AMA board of trustees, in a statement announcing adoption of the policy. “How is it that PBMs and health plans profit from negotiated discounts on prescription drugs while patients pay co-pays based on high drug list prices that even the plans themselves are not paying? Because of market concentration and lack of transparency, patients and physicians are essentially powerless in the face of PBM pricing and coverage decisions,” he added.
According to the AMA, PBMs have similar roles to insurers, yet face no similar oversight, and are hampering policymakers’ efforts to reduce drug costs with their “byzantine” confidential contracts that drive increased costs for drugs without justification.
The new policy calls for active regulation of PBMs by state departments of insurance, application of rebates to drug prices at the point of sale, efforts to ensure that no patients are discriminated against in benefit design, and increased transparency in how direct and indirect remuneration fees are calculated.
AMA also calls for increased PBM transparency, including disclosure of information on topics like rebates, discounts, and utilization; pharmacy and therapeutics committee information; and formulary information, which AMA says should be made available to patients and prescribers at the point of care.
AMA says that it will develop model legislation addressing state-level regulation of PBMs for policymakers to use.
In addition to its attempt to promote policy solutions, the AMA also seeks to get patients involved; the organization’s new policy is linked with AMA’s TruthinRx campaign, a resource for patients to learn about what influences the price of drugs, how drug prices for products like insulin are increasing over time despite competition, and the role of PBMs in negotiating discounts and rebates with drug makers.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.