Amgen recently announced top-line results from a phase 3 clinical trial that sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of its proposed infliximab biosimilar, ABP 710, compared with the reference product (Remicade) in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Amgen recently announced top-line results from a phase 3 clinical trial that sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of its proposed infliximab biosimilar, ABP 710, compared with the reference product (Remicade) in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
The randomized double-blind study enrolled 558 and randomized (1:1) 558 patients with RA to receive either ABP 710 or reference infliximab at a dose of 3 mg/kg infused on day 1, at weeks 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter. The ABP 710 arm, as well as the reference infliximab arm, were equally comprised of 279 patients.
The primary end point of the study was achieving 20% or greater improvement as defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 22. Secondary endpoints included achieving ACR50, ACR70, and disease activity score 28-joint count C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP).
Researchers confirmed the noninferiority of ABP 710 compared with infliximab, but “could not rule out superiority based on its primary efficacy endpoint,” according to the news release. Notably, the DAS28-CRP difference in mean change from the baseline was close to 0, at —0.01 (95% CI, –0.20 to 0.17). In addition, the safety profile and immunogenicity were comparable between ABP 710 and the originator.
“We believe this study confirms no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 710 and [reference] infliximab. Biosimilars are approved based on the analytical, nonclinical, and clinical data, and we believe that the totality of the evidence we’ve generated supports ABP 710 as highly similar to the reference product,” said Sean Harper, MD, executive vice president of research and development at Amgen in a statement.
Amgen is also working on the development of a number of other biosimilar products, including ABP 494, biosimilar cetuximab; ABP 798, biosimilar rituximab; ABP 959, biosimilar eculizumab, and Kanjinti, a trastuzumab biosimilar that was authorized for marketing in Europe in May 2018, 1 day after it was announced that the FDA had issued a Complete Response Letter for the same product.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Risk-Adjusted NPV Framework for Biosimilars Shows Key Investment Drivers
April 7th 2025Early market entry, manufacturing efficiency, and market share are critical to biosimilar development success, while technical complexity and competition heavily impact returns, according to a study presenting a risk-adjusted net present value (NPV) analysis framework.