The Therapeutic Goods Administration has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines (as the FDA currently requires).
Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia has announced that it will not use 4-letter suffixes in naming biologic and biosimilar medicines as the FDA currently requires.
The decision comes after several years of consideration and evaluation, and the adoption of different global approaches. When the time came to make a decision, the TGA considered 4 options:
TGA heard suggestions and concerns from various stakeholders in evaluating its decision. According to TGA, this decision is supported by most stakeholders. TAG’s position includes a future possible move toward adopting the EU’s barcode system, which incorporates the product code, national identification number, batch number, and expiry date.
In addition to the updated naming practice, the government also announced that its decision to strengthen AE reporting will include making the products’ brand name as well as non-proprietary name a mandatory field when reporting an AE.
The International Generic and Biosimilar medicines Association (IGBA) announced its support of the Australian Government’s decision to maintain the existing mandate for naming biologic and biosimilar medicines.
The government’s decision aligns with that of the European Union, which has approved the largest number of biosimilar medicines worldwide. The decision also aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) approach to nomenclature.
The decision stands in contrast to the United States’ approach, however, whereby all biologics and biosimilars must have a 4-letter suffix, devoid of meaning, added to the end of newly approved biologics’ and biosimilars’ nonproprietary names. The first implementation of the FDA’s mandate to apply the suffix to newly approved innovator drugs came in November 2017 with the FDA approval of Roche’s Hemlibra (emicizumab-kxwh).
President Trump Signs Executive Order to Bring Down Drug Prices
April 16th 2025To help bring down sky-high drug prices, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pushing for faster biosimilar development, more transparency, and tougher rules on pharmacy benefit managers—aiming to save billions and make meds more affordable for everyone.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.