The findings indicate that interventions that leverage physician relationships may assist with increasing uptake of new, high-value cancer treatments in place of low-value therapies.
A study published Friday in JAMA Network Open found that peer influence factored heavily into whether oncologists decided to eventually adopt bevacizumab for their patients.
The findings indicate that interventions that leverage physician relationships may assist with increasing uptake of new, high-value cancer treatments in place of low-value therapies, the authors said.
The study took place at the time when only the reference product, Avastin, was available. The first biosimilar bevacizumab, Mvasi, became available in the United States in 2017.
Researchers examined adoption of bevacizumab in 2007 to 2010 among oncologists who had not prescribed the drug in 2005 to 2006.
These oncologists who were associated with fellow oncologists who did use bevacizumab in those years had increased use of the drug in 2007 to 2010.
The cohort study took place in 51 randomly selected hospital referral regions in the United States. Participants were 44,012 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with cancers of the colorectum, lung, breast, kidney, brain, or ovary treated by 3261 oncologists in 2005 to 2010.
Data were analyzed in 2017 to 2018.
Among patients treated with chemotherapy during 2007 to 2010 by an oncologist who had not treated patients with the biologic in 2005 to 2006, models (adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and physician, practice, and community random effects) assessed the association of bevacizumab use with rates of use among connected physicians in 2005 to 2006. Of the 44,012, 34,750 patients were treated with chemotherapy in 2005 to 2006 in the 51 hospital referral regions.
Among 9262 patients treated in 2007 to 2010 by 829 physicians whose patients did not use bevacizumab in 2005 to 2006, 3654 (39.5%) were aged 75 years or older and 6227 (67.2%) were female.
The rate of bevacizumab use relative to other chemotherapy in 2007 to 2010 by tertile of use among their physician’s peers in 2005 to 2006 was 10.0%, 9.5%, and 13.6%, respectively. For all patients receiving chemotherapy, the receipt of bevacizumab was less than 4.4%, 4.4% to 6.2%, and more than 6.2%, respectively.
After adjustment, use of bevacizumab in 2007 to 2010 was greater among physicians in communities with the highest rates of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 compared with those whose peers were in the lowest tertile of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.20-2.25).
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
CHMP Pushes 3 Biosimilars Forward, Spelling Hope for Ophthalmology, Supportive Care Markets
February 6th 2025The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended 3 biosimilars and new indications for reference biologics, moving them closer to final European approval and expanding patient access.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.