Yesterday, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions released bipartisan draft legislation aimed at lowering the cost of healthcare in the United States.
Yesterday, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) released bipartisan draft legislation aimed at lowering the cost of healthcare in the United States.
The package was introduced by chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, and ranking member Patty Murray, D-Washington. Among the 5 sections of the package, the Lower Health Care Costs Act, is a swath of proposals aimed at reducing the prices of prescription drugs, prominently featuring biosimilars’ role in doing so.
This portion of the legislation would require updates to the FDA’s Purple Book, which provides stakeholders with information on biologics. The legislation would codify the Purple Book as a single, searchable list of information that would include, among other information, materials related to patents on biologics.
This section of the legislation also proposes to make updates to the Orange Book, which addresses small-molecule drugs. The FDA would be required to remove patent information if a patent is found to be invalid.
The House of Representatives recently passed similar legislation that would requires these same changes to the Purple and Orange Books.
The Senate’s package also addresses the abuse of citizen petitions, saying that the FDA can deny a petition that is submitted with the aim of delaying approval of a competitive drug and allowing HHS to refer such petitions to the Federal Trade Commission.
Additionally, the legislation clarifies that transition products cannot receive new marketing exclusivities and prevents first-to-file generic applicants from blocking subsequent entrants beyond a 180-day exclusivity period. It codifies the March 2020 transition of these products—including insulin—into law, and states that marketing applications that are submitted 6 months before the transition will not need to be resubmitted to the FDA.
The proposed legislation also stipulates that the FDA would be required to establish a website for stakeholder education on biologics, including biosimilars and interchangeable products, and allows for the development and improvement of continuing medical education for providers on these topics.
Notably, the bill excludes all biologics from requirements to follow the United States Pharmacopeia’s standards.
In an email to The Center for Biosimilars®, a representative from the Biosimilars Forum voiced the organization’s support for the bill, saying that “The Biosimilars Forum commends the Senate HELP Committee for including language that would direct the FDA to close the education gap and expel misinformation about biosimilars for both patients and providers. Misinformation and a lack of understanding about lower-cost biosimilars is threatening patients’ access to these life-saving therapies and costing the US billions in untapped savings throughout the health care system.”
The additional 4 sections of the bill include the following objectives:
Ending surprise medical bills
This portion of the legislation proposes to protect patients from out-of-network deductibles when seeking emergency care, and to ensure that patients are held harmless from surprise medical bills. Patients would be required to pay only their in-network cost-sharing amount for out-of-network emergency care.
Improving transparency in healthcare
This component of the package would, among other provisions, create a nonprofit entity to improve transparency of healthcare costs, require health plans to have up-to-date directories of their in-network providers, require healthcare facilities to engage in timely billing, prohibit pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) from engaging in spread pricing, and require PBMs to pass on all of their rebates to plan sponsors.
Improving public health
This portion of the package includes such provisions as raising awareness of vaccines and combatting vaccine-related misinformation, requiring HHS to disseminate a guide on obesity prevention, and establishing a grant program for improving maternal healthcare quality.
Improving the exchange of health information
Included in this segment of the legislation are provisions that would require the Government Accountability Office to investigate gaps in privacy and security protections for patients’ health information and incentivize strong cybersecurity practices.
In a statement, Alexander said that he expects a vote on the act in July 2019.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Eye on Pharma: EU Aflibercept Approvals; Biosimilars Canada Campaign; Celltrion Data
November 19th 2024The European Commission grants marketing authorization to 2 aflibercept biosimilars; Biosimilars Canada launches new campaign to provide sustainable solutions to employers; Celltrion shares positive data for 2 biosimilars.
Can Global Policies to Boost Biosimilar Adoption Work in the US?
November 17th 2024On this special episode of Not So Different honoring Global Biosimilars Week, Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, explores how global policies—from incentives to health equity strategies—could boost biosimilar adoption in the US.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.