A newly introduced item of legislation proposes to eliminate co-payments for patients when they receive a biosimilar rather than an originator biologic in Medicare Part B.
A newly introduced item of legislation proposes to eliminate co-payments for patients when they receive a biosimilar rather than an originator biologic in Medicare Part B.
The Acting to Cancel Copays and Ensure Substantial Savings for Biosimilars (ACCESS) Act, or HR 4597, was introduced this week by Representatives Scott Peters, D-California; Pete King, R-New York; and Anthony Brindisi, D-New York. The bill, which would amend Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, has now been referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and to the House Ways and Means Committee.
According to a statement made by Peters, “The government can and should drive down drug costs and one way we can do that is by increasing competition. If we eliminate copays on biosimilars, it will increase their widespread use and provide a market incentive to drive down overall drug costs. I am committed to lowering health care costs and expanding treatment options for all Americans, and the bipartisan ACCESS Act does just that.”
King added that the legislation is an important step in the ongoing effort to rein in drug prices for some of the most expensive drugs and that the bill could increase patient access to therapy.
Biosimilars trade group the Biosimilars Forum, which represents 8 biosimilar developers, applauded the bill’s introduction, saying in a statement that “Patients and taxpayers win with this legislation.” According to the forum, the legislation will support development of lower-cost drugs and will alleviate the financial burdens felt by American patients who struggle to afford biologic treatment.
“To date, there are 23 FDA-approved biosimilars. With only 9 available to patients, uptake continues to be low, adding costs to taxpayers and patients. This is proof enough that more needs to be done by Congress, [CMS], and others to spur and sustain a vibrant, competitive biosimilars market,” said the forum.
Introduction of the ACCESS Act comes shortly after numerous groups, including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the Association of Community Cancer Centers, Employers Health, the Pacific Business Group on Health, the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America, CVS Health, and others, called on HHS to end cost sharing for biosimilars in Part B. In a letter to HHS Secretary Alex Azar, the groups said that the move would not only increase affordability for patients in Part B, but could also influence the rest of the payer market, as many commercial payers often follow CMS’ payment policies.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Commemorating the 15th Anniversary of the BPCIA
April 8th 2025Affirming that analytical characterization is often sufficient for biosimilar approval, minimizing unnecessary clinical testing, and enhancing FDA-led education to counter stakeholder misconceptions are key recommendations put forth in this opinion piece by Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.