Earlier this week, Bioprocess International reported that Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) had decided to focus on launching its biosimilar products solely in the US market, and would forego launches in the European Union. The Center for Biosimilars® was able to independently confirm this report in an email with a representative from BI.
Earlier this week, Bioprocess International reported that Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) had decided to focus on launching its biosimilar products solely in the US market, and would forego launches in the European Union (EU). The Center for Biosimilars® was able to independently confirm this report in an email with a representative from BI.
“Our focus is on bringing Cyltezo (adalimumab-abdm) to the US market and we are committed to making it available to US patients as soon as possible, and certainly before 2023,” said the BI spokesperson.
“Boehringer Ingelheim believes the introduction of high-quality, lower-cost biosimilars is critical for both patients and the sustainability of the healthcare system. At this point in time, future biosimilars activities will be driven out of the US market, including partnership opportunities, while Boehringer Ingelheim is stopping development activities for the rest of the world,” said BI’s representative.
AbbVie, the developer of reference adalimumab sold as Humira, has entered into 6 patent litigation settlements with biosimilar adalimumab developers to date. Under the terms of each settlement, approved biosimilar adalimumab products were able to launch in the EU as recently as last month, while the US market will have to wait until 2023 to see any of those products enter the market.
BI alone has not settled its patent dispute with AbbVie, and the case over Cyltezo is moving forward in a Delaware District Court. In the suit, AbbVie asserted 74 patents covering its reference adalimumab product. BI is arguing that that AbbVie engaged in a “pattern of pursuing numerous overlapping and non-inventive patents for the purpose of developing a ‘patent thicket,’ using the patenting process itself as a means to seek to delay competition.”
To support its defense, BI asked the court to compel AbbVie to produce research and development documents dated outside the default 6-year period. Though the court rejected BI’s argument that the case was “unusual given the number of patents and claims at issue,” the court did order AbbVie to produce such documents in June 2018, finding that the information is relevant to the litigation.
BI is also investigating interchangeability of its product with the reference Humira.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
The Biosimilar Void: 90% of Biologics Coming Off Patent Will Lack Biosimilars
February 5th 2025Of the 118 biologics losing exclusivity over the next decade, only 10% have biosimilars in development, meaning a vast majority of biologics have no pipeline, which limits savings potential for the health care system.
The Banking of Biosimilars: Insights From a Leading Health Economist
February 4th 2025Biosimilars have the potential to reduce health care costs and expand patient access, but economic and policy barriers affect adoption, explored James D. Chambers, PhD, MPharm, MSc, associate professor at the Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, in an interview.