According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), enacting the bill would increase direct spending by about $18.7 billion and increase direct revenues by $26.2 billion, resulting in a net decrease in the deficit of $7.6 billion by 2029.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has released its score of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions’ proposed bill, S.1895, the Lower Health Care Costs Act. According to the CBO, enacting the bill would increase direct spending by about $18.7 billion and increase direct revenues by $26.2 billion, resulting in a net decrease in the deficit of $7.6 billion by 2029.
The proposed legislation comprises 5 elements: ending surprise medical bills, reducing the prices of prescription drugs, improving transparency in health care, improving public health, and improving the exchange of health information.
Among those sections, elements aimed at reducing drug prices would be responsible for a substantial share of the savings; the CBO says that these provisions would result in a net decrease in the deficit of $4.6 billion over the coming decade.
Key to reducing drug prices are several of the bill’s provisions that apply to generics and biosimilars. According to the CBO, some of these elements of the bill would allow generics and biosimilars to reach the market sooner, leading to a decline in federal spending on prescription drugs and subsidies for health insurance.
Provisions in this portion of the bill would allow the FDA to:
The CBO states that the section of the bill providing the right to sue over sample availability and removal of the requirement to share a risk management system would, on its own, account for more than $3.7 billion in savings over 10 years. This substantial reduction in the deficit would result, in part, from the ability of generics and biosimilars to reach the market 1 to 2 years earlier, on average.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.