An editorial recently published in The BMJ discusses addresses 1 of the most commonly misunderstood biosimilar concepts: extrapolation.
In 2017, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) published its position paper on biosimilars for oncology prescribers. Since the paper's publication, both the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved biosimilar versions of monoclonal antibodies to treat multiple cancer types, but misconceptions about biosimilars are still prevalent.
An editorial recently published in The BMJ discusses addresses 1 of the most commonly misunderstood biosimilar concepts: extrapolation. The authors define extrapolation as “the authorization of a biosimilar medicine for clinical indications of the reference medicine without the need to conduct clinical trials of the biosimilar medicine in those indications.” The crucial part in understanding the concept is to first acknowledge that extrapolation is a well-established regulatory and scientific principle that has been used well before the arrival of biosimilar medicines.
As an example, the authors explain that the principle of extrapolation is also applied after major changes in the manufacturing process of a biologic. When this kind of change takes place, the manufacturer is required by regulatory agencies to conduct a comprehensive comparability exercise to establish that the pre-manufacturing change and post-manufacturing change products are sufficiently similar. Clinical data are usually studied in 1 indication and extrapolated to the other indications, while taking into account all data generated by the comparability exercise.
The authors note that potential confusion around extrapolation may come about from the term itself. When utilized in mathematical terms, "extrapolation" refers to the projection of unknown values from trends in known data. However, when the term is applied to biosimilar medicines, extrapolation is based on the knowledge that the biosimilar medicine is similar to the reference in all critical quality attributes. In fact, Health Canada previously acknowledged the confusion around the terminology and consequently removed the term “extrapolation” from its biosimilar guidance in 2016.
The authors say that it is important to understand that extrapolation is undertaken from the reference to the biosimilar medicine—molecule to molecule—rather than from 1 indication in which the biosimilar medicine has been studied to other indications. Furthermore, each extrapolated indication needs to be scientifically justified and assessed by regulators.
“From regulatory and scientific viewpoints, the active substance of a biosimilar is just another version of the active substance of the reference medicine,” said the authors.
Reference
Krendyukov A, Schiestl M. Extrapolation concept at work with biosimilar: a decade of experience in oncology. Published February 6, 2018. Br Med J. doi:10.1136/ esmoopen-2017-000319.
Eye on Pharma: Sandoz Files Antitrust Suit; Yuflyma Interchangeability; Costco’s Ustekinumab Pick
April 22nd 2025Sandoz's antitrust suit against Amgen, the FDA’s interchangeability designation for Celltrion’s adalimumab biosimilar, and the inclusion of an ustekinumab biosimilar in Costco’s prescription program highlight growing momentum to expand biosimilar access and affordability for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Biosimilars Oncology Roundup for June 2024—Podcast Edition
July 7th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we review biosimilar news coming out of June, with clinical trial results from conferences and a study showcasing how to overcome economic and noneconomic barriers to oncology biosimilars.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Latest Biosimilar Deals Signal Growth Across Immunology, Oncology Markets
April 14th 2025During Q1 2025, pharmaceutical companies accelerated biosimilar expansion through strategic acquisitions and partnerships in hopes of boosting patient access to lower-cost treatments in immunology and oncology.