CVS Caremark will allow clients to exclude any drug launched at a price greater than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year from their plans.
CVS Health recently released a white paper that announced that its pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), CVS Caremark, will utilize techniques employed by other PBMs in an attempt to curb the cost of drugs.
“Our responsibility to our clients is to help ensure plan members take appropriate, cost-effective medications that improve health outcomes and lower overall medical costs. If price reductions by pharmaceutical manufacturers can help bring down drug costs, then we are in favor of it,” read the white paper. It went on to say that, “if only a few manufacturers make such reductions, it may only affect a few medications."
Click here to read more about recent formulary changes.
The plan outlined 3 specific efforts CVS Caremark has implemented: encouraging the use of lower-cost alternatives through step therapy, using prior authorization, and using competition to determine which drugs will be listed on formulary when there is more than 1 clinically equivalent drug available. Provided as an example for how the PBM has attempted to lower the cost of drugs, the white paper pointed to CVS’ coverage of a follow-on insulin, Basaglar, under its Standard Formulary, chosen over the reference Lantus. “Moving all users to Basaglar would lead to savings of more than $30 million per year,” it said.
Now, CVS will also begin to employ 3 new strategies: assisting patients in the deductible phase of their insurance, addressing the launch price of new medications, and emphasizing transparency so that members and their pharmacists can understand the true cost of a prescribed medication.
Furthermore, CVS stated that if clients employ point-of-sale rebates and follow the CVS Caremark Standard Formulary, it will be able to implement “a zero-dollar drug list” for chronic conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma and COPD, and depression.
However, under this program, CVS Caremark will “allow clients to exclude any drug launched at a price greater than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from their plan.” The QALY ratio is determined based on public analyses from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER). Additionally, the plan notes, “Medications deemed ‘breakthrough’ therapies by the [FDA] will be excluded from this program, which will focus on expensive, ‘me-too’ medications that are not cost effective.”
ICER has historically had a tense relationship with the pharmaceutical industry, as the organization is known for drawing attention to the high cost of drugs. This is notably the first time to date that ICER is playing a formal role in coverage decisions. Industry groups such as the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy and the National Pharmaceutical Council have spoken out about the methods and motives behind ICER’s evaluations.
The unveiling of this program from CVS came just a week after CMS announced that it will allow Medicare Advantage plans to negotiate drug prices for physician-administered programs and other Part B drugs by allowing plans to use step therapy for newly diagnosed patients.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.