This week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced that it will scale back and even fully suspend a number of its activities in order to cope with Brexit-related pressures, and as the possibility grows stronger that the United Kingdom and the European Union may not reach a trade agreement, some drug makers have begun to stockpile key medicines to help guard against a supply disruption.
This week, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced that it will scale back and even fully suspend a number of its activities in order to cope with Brexit-related pressures.
The agency says that, through 2019, it will reduce or halt its work on international collaboration (including taking only a “reactive role” on the harmonization of global medicine regulation), the development and revision of guidelines, and the launch of new procedures for clinical data publication, among other activities.
These cuts come in addition to rollbacks made in 2017 as part of an initial Brexit preparedness effort. The programs suspended last year include the development of a European Medicines Web Portal, contribution to an electronic submission portal to allow for online filing of documents related to drug applications, and participation in benchmarking EU member states’ regulatory agencies.
The agency says that the cuts to activities are the result of losing more staff than it initially anticipated in preparing for its move from London, United Kingdom to Amsterdam, Netherlands. While the EMA initially said that it could expect to retain approximately 65% of its staff overall in the move, in this week’s announcement, it indicated that it now expects to lose approximately 30% of its workers in the near term, and that it has “a high degree of uncertainty regarding mid-term staff retention.” Dutch employment laws appear to be partly to blame for the loss of workers; more than 100 contract staff will no longer be permitted to work for the EMA after its move.
Meanwhile, as the possibility grows stronger that the United Kingdom and the European Union may not reach a trade agreement, some drug makers have begun to stockpile key medicines to help guard against a supply disruption. Drug makers Sanofi and Novartis have confirmed to the BBC that they are holding extra units of their products so that patients will not have to go without their medication in the event of a “no-deal” Brexit and a disruption to trade.
The chair of the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, Sir Michael Rawlins, has spoken candidly about the fact that supply chain disruption could leave people with diabetes without access to insulin. Speaking to The Pharmaceutical Journal, Rawlins highlighted the fact that the United Kingdom manufactures no insulin itself, and relies of the European Union for its supply. “We can’t suddenly start manufacturing insulin,” he noted.
Currently, 45 million patient-ready packages of medicines are supplied to the European Union from the United Kingdom each month, and the United Kingdom receives 37 million packages each month from the European Union.
13 Strategies to Avoid the Nocebo Effect During Biosimilar Switching
December 18th 2024A systematic review identified 13 strategies, including patient and provider education, empathetic communication, and shared decision-making, to mitigate the nocebo effect in biosimilar switching, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted approach to improve patient perceptions and therapeutic outcomes.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
BioRationality: Withdrawal of Proposed Terminal Disclaimer Rule Spells Major Setback for Biosimilars
December 10th 2024The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s withdrawal of its proposed terminal disclaimer rule is seen as a setback for biosimilar developers, as it preserves patent prosecution practices that favor originator companies and increases costs for biosimilar competition, according to Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.
Perceptions of Biosimilar Switching Among Veterans With IBD
December 2nd 2024Veterans with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) prioritize shared decision-making, transparency, and individualized care in biosimilar switching, favoring delayed switching for severe cases and greater patient control.