Early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can have a more aggressive course than later-onset disease, making prompt treatment for children with IBD especially important. Given the high cost of biologics that treat pediatric IBD—adalimumab and infliximab—biosimilars are emerging as an important cost-saving option that can prevent the premature termination of biologic therapy for financial reasons.
Early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can have a more aggressive course than later-onset disease, making prompt treatment for children with IBD especially important. Given the high cost of biologics that treat pediatric IBD—adalimumab and infliximab—biosimilars are emerging as an important cost-saving option that can prevent the premature termination of biologic therapy for financial reasons.
A new paper, published in World Journal of Gastroenterology, reviews the available data on biosimilars in treating children with IBD, concluding that these studies support using biosimilars in this patient population.
Shortly after biosimilars became available in Europe, the authors note, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the Paediatric IBD Porto Group released an expert opinion paper directed toward pediatric gastroenterologists. The paper put forth 3 positions on using biosimilars in pediatric patients with IBD: high priority should be given to conducting pediatric trials with long-term follow-up, switching patients during sustained remission was discouraged until data were more mature, and postmarketing surveillance should be undertaken in children with IBD.
Despite those cautions—particularly because of the limited availability or even lack of availability of the reference products—some centers did adopt or switch to biosimilars to treat children with IBD.
One multicenter study in 278 pediatric patients reported on patients who started reference infliximab (n = 175), infliximab biosimilars (n = 82), or adalimumab (n = 21), but few patients had Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) scores available at baseline or at the 3-month follow-up. However, at follow-up, 85% of the reference infliximab group and 86% of the biosimilar infliximab group had a response, and 68% and 79%, respectively, achieved remission. No unexpected adverse events (AEs) were observed.
Another study, concerning induction with biosimilar infliximab, was conducted in 36 patients in 3 Polish hospitals. Three induction doses were given to 34 (94.4%) of the patients. After 14 weeks following the first dose, 86% of patients had a clinical response, and 67% achieved remission. One allergic reaction was reported. No serious AEs were reported.
A study from the United Kingdom found that, among 40 patients, most of whom were naïve to anti—tumor necrosis factor therapy, treatment with biosimilar infliximab resulted in remission for 67% of patients. One patient had an allergic reaction.
Two studies in pediatric patients with IBD have reported on switching. The first, conducted in Poland, involved 39 patients, all over 16 years of age. These patients were switched to biosimilars because of unavailability of the reference infliximab. None of them presented with disease exacerbation after the switch, and no serious AEs occurred.
A second switching study, conducted in the Republic of Korea, compared 36 patients who remained on reference infliximab to 38 patients who switched to CT-P13. Sustained remission was attained by 77.8% of those who continued with the reference versus 78.9% of those who switched. Nos serious AEs or infusion-related reactions were observed.
“To date, published data on pediatric IBD remain limited. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned studies show that the efficacy and safety of biosimilars and the originator infliximab are similar,” concluded the authors.
Reference
Sieczkowska-Golub J, Jarzebicka D, Oracz G, Kierkus J. Biosimilars in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(35):4021-4027. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4021.
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Early Success of Adalimumab Biosimilars Featured at AMCP 2025
April 5th 2025High adherence rates, comparable clinical effectiveness, and cost savings have marked the early adoption of adalimumab biosimilars in the US, particularly in formulary-driven transitions, as shown in 2 retrospective studies presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy annual meeting (AMCP 2025).
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Patients With IBD Maintain Therapy 2 Years Post Switching to Infliximab Biosimilar
March 23rd 2025People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 had higher treatment persistence (84% and 91%) than those new to infliximab (66% and 53%), with no new safety concerns.