In the case study, the authors report findings from a comparability assessment of epoetin alfa before and after a proposed manufacturing process change for which, they say, nonclinical assessment of structure-function relationships were not sensitive enough to identify clinically relevant differences resulting from differences in the drug’s glycosylation profile.
When biologic sponsors propose to make changes to manufacturing, they must perform comparability studies to confirm that there are no significant differences in structural or functional attributes of the drug that could cause clinically meaningful changes in safety or efficacy. If a change is complex, or if clinically relevant differences are possible, bridging studies are often required to confirm overall comparability. Such studies, say authors of a recent paper published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, have implications for demonstrations of biosimilarity.
In the case study, the authors report findings from a comparability assessment of epoetin alfa before and after a proposed manufacturing process change for which, they say, nonclinical assessment of structure-function relationships were not sensitive enough to identify clinically relevant differences resulting from differences in the drug’s glycosylation profile.
Epoetin alfa is manufactured using mammalian cell culture technology, and changes to manufacturing conditions can affect quality attributes. To assess possible effects, structural, functional, and nonclinical pharmacology studies were conducted to evaluate the drug prechange and postchange, as were clinical bridging studies: one was a single-dose crossover study in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), in which the predetermined equivalence criterion was that the geometric ratio of area under time concentration-time curve (AUC)-t for the postchange versus the prechange product should have a 90% confidence interval (CI) between 80% and 125%. The other was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind hemoglobin and dose-equivalence trial that enrolled adult patients with CKD who were receiving hemodialysis.
The analytical comparability studies determined that the postchange product was comparable with the prechange material with the exception of minor quantitative differences in certain glycosylation structures that were not suspected to have an effect on biological function or safety of the drug. In vitro and in vivo functional assays showed the postchange product to be equivalent to the prechange product in terms of potency and pharmacodynamics.
In the single-dose crossover study, 30 patients initiated and completed the study, and the geometric ratio of AUC the from time zero to the last time sampled for the prechange and postchange product met predefined criteria for demonstrating bioequivalence (90% CI, 94.8%-104.3%).
However, in the phase 3 study in 462 patients, the log dose-ratio difference was −0.15 (90% CI, −0.25 to −0.06), demonstrating the postchange drug was more potent than the prechange drug, with the 90% CI values falling outside the prespecified equivalence margin. The researchers ultimately determined that the difference in potency was attributable to an increase in lactosamine content in the postchange epoetin alfa.
“These results illustrate that initial assumptions about the clinical relevance of certain structural attributes...may be incorrect,” write the authors. “We found in this case study that the common approach to assess the relevance of these observed structural differences using common in vitro functional assays may result in misleading conclusions and contribute to confirmation bias.”
This case study underscores the importance of the stepwise development exercise needed for biosimilar approval; the scope and burden of proof for each step in the exercise, say the authors, is informed by the residual uncertainty in the previous stages, as well as by limitations and sensitivities of any part of the clinical program to detect relevant differences.
Reference
Grampp G, McElroy PL, Camblin G, Pollock A. Structure-function relationships for recombinant erythropoietins: a case study from a proposed manufacturing change with implications for erythropoietin biosimilar study designs [Published online February 4, 2018]. J Pharm Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.01.018.
Review Calls for Path to Global Harmonization of Biosimilar Development Regulations
March 17th 2025Global biosimilar regulatory harmonization will be needed to reduce development costs and improve patient access, despite challenges posed by differing national requirements and regulatory frameworks, according to review authors.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
From Amjevita to Zarxio: A Decade of US Biosimilar Approvals
March 6th 2025Since the FDA’s groundbreaking approval of Zarxio in 2015, the US biosimilars market has surged to 67 approvals across 18 originators—though the journey has been anything but smooth, with adoption facing hurdles along the way.
A New Chapter: How 2023 Will Shape the US Biosimilar Space for 2024 and Beyond
December 31st 2023On this episode of Not So Different, Cencora's Brian Biehn and Corey Ford take a look back at major policy and regulatory advancements in 2023 and how these changes will alter the space going forward.
Biosimilar Approvals Streamlined With Advanced Statistics Amidst Differing Regulatory Requirements
February 25th 2025The FDA and European Medicines Agency (EMA) mandate high similarity between biosimilars and reference products, but their regulatory processes differ, especially with multiple reference products.