Mylan revealed in its recent fourth quarter 2018 earnings call that it had an initial advisory meeting with the FDA regarding a proposed biosimilar onabotulinumtoxinA, referencing the brand-name Botox.
Mylan revealed in its recent fourth quarter 2018 earnings call that it had an initial advisory meeting with the FDA regarding a proposed biosimilar onabotulinumtoxinA, referencing the brand-name Botox.
Mylan said that the FDA’s feedback leads it to believe that the biosimilar approval pathway is viable for this product, and that Mylan could be the first developer to commercialize a biosimilar onabotulinumtoxinA.
The originator onabotulinumtoxinA, a neuromuscular blocking agent, is approved to treat conditions including incontinence due to neurological conditions, prophylaxis of headache in patients with migraine, upper limb spasticity, cervical dystonia, and strabismus, among other indications, such as its cosmetic uses.
Mylan’s development partner for the candidate, Revance, said that successful completion of a biosimilar program could result in FDA approval for all 11 FDA-approved indications for the reference product, and Revance’s president and chief executive officer said in a recent earnings call that “we know what needs to be done, and the FDA has set the right level of expectations” for biosimilar approval.
Allergan and Medytox, makers of the brand-name Botox, face a recent competitor, the recently FDA-approved prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs, marketed as Jeuveau. Despite being a purified botulinum toxin type A, like the innovator Botox, the newly authorized product was submitted to the FDA under a new Biologics License Application, and was not treated as a biosimilar of the innovator Botox. Its developer, Evolus, in partnership with drug maker Daewoong, sought only indications for the product’s aesthetic use, and the product is not approved for medical indications.
Allergan and Medytox are hoping to block Jeuveau’s sales in the United States; the companies filed a complaint with the US International Trade Commission in which they asked for an investigation into Evolus’ manufacturing of botulinum toxin products. While details of the complaint are confidential, Bloomberg reported that Allergan and Medytox have alleged that the rival product was developed using manufacturing secrets stolen by an Evolus employee.
Allergan and Medytox seek an immediate investigation into whether the product was developed, made, or imported using stolen secrets, and ask for Evolus to be prohibited from selling the drug in the United States.
BioRationality: Biosimilar Associations and Stakeholders Representing Biosimilars
January 20th 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, dives into the role that biosimilar associations and organizations play in promoting biosimilars as well as how their stakeholder demographic and main objectives differ from one another.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Eye on Pharma: Korean Drugmakers’ Impact in Europe; New Denosumab, Eculizumab Deals
January 11th 2025Korean drugmakers hold over 50% market share in the 6 best-selling biosimilar markets, 2 companies sign exclusive licensing partnership for a denosumab biosimilar, and 2 others join forces for an eculizumab biosimilar.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Study Confirms CT-P42 Therapeutic Equivalence to Reference Aflibercept in DME
January 6th 2025The phase 3 trial showed biosimilar CT-P42 (Celltrion) is therapeutically equivalent to reference aflibercept in improving visual acuity in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), with comparable efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity at 24 weeks, with more long-term data expected.