Bio-Thera Solutions announced that a phase 3 clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of its bevacizumab biosimilar, BAT1706, to the reference product (Avastin), returned positive top-line results.
Bio-Thera Solutions announced that a phase 3 clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of its bevacizumab biosimilar, BAT1706, to the reference product (Avastin) returned positive top-line results.
The Chinese commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company said in a press release that BAT1706 proved equivalent to bevacizumab in overall response rate as a first-line treatment for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
“We are pleased to report on our second proposed biosimilar with positive study results,” said Shenfeng Li, PhD, the chief executive officer of Bio-Thera Solutions. “These results demonstrate the potential of our proposed bevacizumab biosimilar to be a safe and effective treatment option for cancer patients. Bio-Thera is committed to increasing patient access to innovative medicines through the development of high-quality biosimilars.”
Avastin is indicated in the US to treat metastatic colorectal cancer, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, along with other conditions.
According to the press release, “BAT1706 works by binding the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein.” It has not yet received regulatory approval in any country.
The trial consisted of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study which evaluated the pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAT1706. Results of the study have yet to be released and the company is developing several other proposed biosimilars including ustekinumab, secukinumab and golimumab.
Separately this week, the FDA requested data for Formycon’s Lucentis biosimilar candidate FYB201, as part of a review process for a biologics license application (BLA). The company stated it will take around 4 months to generate the additional data. However, Bioeq, its licensing partner, announced it would withdraw its BLA for the biosimilar candidate, provide requested data, and resubmit the application after, which may delay approval of the BLA.
Denosumab Biosimilars Earn Positive CHMP Opinion for Bone Loss and Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
November 26th 2024The European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has issued a positive opinion for the denosumab biosimilars SB16 for all indications referencing Prolia and Xgeva.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
The Rebate War: How Originator Companies Are Fighting Back Against Biosimilars
November 25th 2024Few biologics in the US have multiple biosimilar competitors, but originator biologics respond quickly to competition by increasing rebates and lowering net prices, despite short approval-to-launch timelines for biosimilars.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Achieving PFS in Advanced Gastric Cancer With HLX02 Biosimilar, Chemotherapy
November 23rd 2024In a phase 2 study, the addition of HLX22, an anti-HER2 antibody, to HLX02 biosimilar and XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) chemotherapy extended progression-free survival (PFS) in untreated HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer patients.
Boosting Health Care Sustainability: The Role of Biosimilars in Latin America
November 21st 2024Biosimilars could improve access to biologic treatments and health care sustainability in Latin America, but their adoption is hindered by misconceptions, regulatory gaps, and weak pharmacovigilance, requiring targeted education and stronger regulations.