The FDA has approved Samsung Bioepis’ etanercept biosimilar, SB4, as Eticovo (etanercept-ykro). A representative from Samsung Bioepis has confirmed approval of the product to The Center for Biosimilars® in an email. The biosimilar is already approved in a variety of other markets under the name Benepali.
This story has been updated.
The FDA has approved Samsung Bioepis’ etanercept biosimilar, SB4, as Eticovo (etanercept-ykro). Before the FDA announced this development, a representative from Samsung Bioepis confirmed approval of the product to The Center for Biosimilars® in an email.
The biosimilar was approved to treat all indications of its reference, Enbrel: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis.
Samsung Bioepis’ biosimilar is already approved in a variety of other markets under the names Benepali and Brenzys. The biosimilar earned its first approval in the Republic of Korea in 2015, followed by approvals in the European Union, Canada, Australia, and other markets 2016. Worldwide, the biosimilar was responsible for $124 million in sales last quarter.
The biosimilar was assessed in a phase 3 study versus the reference Enbrel in patients with RA that was not well controlled despite treatment with methotrexate.1 In the trial 596 patients were randomized to receive either the biosimilar (n = 299) or the reference (n = 297).
The percentage of patients who achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) was 78.1% in the biosimilar arm and 80.3% in the reference arm. The 95% confidence interval of the adjusted treatment difference was −9.41% to 4.98%, which was fully contained within the prespecified equivalence margin (−15% to 15%).
Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between arms (55.2% versus 58.2%), but the incidence of antidrug antibodies at week 24 was notably lower in the biosimilar arm (0.7%) than in the reference arm (13.1%).
At week 52, ACR20 response rates in the per-protocol set were comparable between biosimilar arm (80.8%) and reference arm (81.5%) and were maintained up to week 52.2 Radiographic progression was also comparable, and the change from baseline in modified total Sharp score was 0.45 for the biosimilar and 0.74 for the reference. The incidence of antidrug antibodies remained lower in the biosimilar arm (1.0%) than the reference arm (13.2%).
Observational studies have also reported patient satisfaction with self-administration of the biosimilar in a prefilled pen, and the biosimilar has been the subject of numerous real-world studies that have shown that nonmedical switching to the drug did not negatively impact disease measures, though other studies have reported that patients who started treatment with the biosimilar had higher retention than those who switched from the reference drug.
Eticovo is the second biosimilar etanercept approved by the FDA; the first was Sandoz’s Erelzi, which has been the subject of lengthy litigation with Enbrel’s sponsor, Amgen. Despite having been approved in 2016, Erelzi has not yet launched in the United States, and it is unlikely to do so until legal issues have been resolved.
No launch date has been announced for Eticovo.
Reference
1. Emery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. A phase III randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing SB4 with etanercept reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(1):51-57. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207588.
2. Emery P, Vencovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. 52-week results of the phase 3 randomized study comparing SB4 with reference etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. 2017;56(12):2093-2101. Rheumatology (Oxford). doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex269.
BioRationality: EMA Accepts Waiver of Clinical Efficacy Testing of Biosimilars
April 21st 2025Sarfaraz K. Niazi, PhD, shares his latest citizen's petition to the FDA, calling on the agency to waive clinical efficacy testing in response to the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) efforts towards the same goal.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
How State Substitution Laws Shape Insulin Biosimilar Adoption
April 15th 2025States with fewer restrictions on biosimilar substitution tend to see higher uptake of interchangeable insulin glargine, showing how even small policy details can significantly influence biosimilar adoption and expand access to more affordable insulin.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
Experts Pressure Congress to Remove Roadblocks for Biosimilars
April 12th 2025Lawmakers and expert witnesses emphasized the potential of biosimilars to lower health care costs by overcoming barriers like pharmacy benefit manager practices, limited awareness, and regulatory delays to improve access and competition in chronic disease management during a recent congressional hearing.