The FDA has published its Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA) rates for 2018. The Biosimilar User Fee Amendments of 2017 (BsUFA II) authorize the agency to assess and collect fees from applicants for biosimilar products from October 2017 to September 2022.
The FDA has published its Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA) rates for 2018. The Biosimilar User Fee Amendments of 2017 (BsUFA II) authorize the agency to assess and collect fees from applicants for biosimilar products from October 2017 to September 2022. The FDA uses the fees to expedite the review process for biosimilars.
Some of the 2018 rates represent substantial increases from those charged in 2017:
However, application fees will see some reductions:
The 2018 fees include a new program fee of $304,162, but eliminates 2 fee categories: product fees ($97,750) and establishment fees ($512,200).
The agency also released its performance goals for the coming year. The agency plans to review and act on:
The agency also has plans to improve its performance with respect to original manufacturing supplements. In 2018, its goal is to review and act on 70% of manufacturing supplements requiring prior approval within 4 months of receipt. That percentage will increase by 5% per year until 2022, when the FDA plans to act on 90% of such supplements within the same timeframe. Manufacturing supplements that do not require prior approval will be reviewed, across all years from 2018 to 2022, within 6 months of receipt.
The FDA will also implement its program for enhanced review transparency and communication for original 351 Biologics License Applications. According to the FDA, the program is designed to promote efficiency and effectiveness of the first review cycle process for biosimilars, and to minimize the number of review cycles needed for an approval. Under the program, the FDA review team and the biosimilar applicant may follow a standard communication approach, or may reach a mutual agreement on the timing and nature of interaction and the information exchange between the 2 parties.
Under a standard approach, the agency will hold a presubmission meeting with the applicant to discuss the planned content of the application, the applicant will submit an original application, and the FDA will communicate substantive review issues in its Day 74 letter (or notify the applicant if no substantive review issues were identified). The BsUFA review period will begin at the end of the 60-day filing review period beginning on the day of the FDA’s receipt of the original submission. The FDA will communicate with the applicant mid-cycle in the review process to provide an update on the review’s status, and will also meet with the applicant late in the cycle. For applications that will be subject to an advisory committee meeting, the FDA plans to convene meetings not later than 2 months prior to the BsUFA goal date. The FDA plans to complete all inspections for applications in each program within 10 months of having received an application.
Ranibizumab Biosimilar Shows Reduced Efficacy vs Aflibercept in nAMD
April 3rd 2025The ranibizumab biosimilar Ongavia exhibited significantly less improvement in visual acuity and retinal thickness compared with aflibercept (Eylea) in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), highlighting a potential trade-off between economic savings and clinical efficacy.
How AI Can Help Address Cost-Related Nonadherence to Biologic, Biosimilar Treatment
March 9th 2025Despite saving billions, biosimilars still account for only a small share of the biologics market—what's standing in the way of broader adoption and how can artificial intelligence (AI) help change that?
Biosimilars Gastroenterology Roundup: March 2025
April 1st 2025As the biosimilar industry celebrates a decade of growth, the market continues to evolve with expanded treatment options, cost savings, and a flurry of new competitors—yet regulatory challenges, market dynamics, and patient accessibility remain key hurdles to unlocking its full potential.
Will the FTC Be More PBM-Friendly Under a Second Trump Administration?
February 23rd 2025On this episode of Not So Different, we explore the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) second interim report on pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) with Joe Wisniewski from Turquoise Health, discussing key issues like preferential reimbursement, drug pricing transparency, biosimilars, shifting regulations, and how a second Trump administration could reshape PBM practices.
PBM Evolution Toward Value-Based Care Shifts to Transparent Pharmacy Pricing
March 30th 2025Josh Canavan, PharmD, RazorMetrics, and Chris O'Dell, Turquoise Health, predict pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) will evolve toward value-based care, mirroring the broader shift toward open-cost structures.
FDA Approves Another Pair of Denosumab Biosimilars, Conexxence and Bomyntra
March 27th 2025The FDA approved another set of denosumab biosimilars, Conexxence/Bomyntra (denosumab-bnht), expanding treatment options for osteoporosis, bone metastases, and other bone-related conditions, amidst a flurry of similar approvals and legal settlements.