New prediction methodology for calculating biosimilar application fees will help the FDA cover its costs and respond quickly to changes in demand, officials said at a public meeting.
In an update on progress made on changing the methodology for calculating biosimilar drug review fees, the FDA said a new system would enable it to better plan for variation in workloads and have the resources available to do an effective job.
Officials reported this week that overall revenue collections for biosimilars were short of revenue targets in fiscal year 2019 by 9%, and fee-paying applications from biosimilar developers were 22% lower than anticipated.
Officials said they have reduced their work commitments to ensure that they have enough biosimilar program funding to carry through the end of fiscal year 2022. “The volatility of the program requires the need to maintain a higher” balance than other programs, officials said during the slide presentation.
How the New System Works
FDA financial experts and consultants convened in the virtual meeting to explain elements of the program that would overcome past limitations that affected their response to applications for review of human drugs including biosimilars.
Broader and more effective use of resource capacity planning (CPA) would allow the FDA “to identify the resources needed before they are needed,” help with revenue adjustment, hiring plans, and financial forecasting, officials said.
A chief problem with the way the agency was budgeting for future needs was its reliance on 3-year historical averages, which officials described as “a lagging indicator” that could not provide a picture of upcoming needs.
They said in the future, CPA would be based on a forward-looking system that adjusts for likely increases, converts drug application submission activity into estimates of likely resource demand, and provides for the timely availability of funding and other resources for hiring and training of needed staff.
“We can actually have a more optimal level of staffing at the time that we need the staffing to deliver on our review timelines and public health mission,” said Josh Barton, director of the Resource Capacity Planning Team in the Office of Program and Strategic Analysis at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Officials added that the revised system would take into account the unique complexities that each project brings with it. This complexity adjustment would enable the agency to determine how much additional time would be required to complete an application review.
They described the new plan as “accurate, adaptable, and defensible.”
Although the FDA has described its prior system of calculating resource needs as inadequate, the agency has been exceptionally challenged this year with the advent of the new coronavirus (COVID-19), a public health crisis that has changed priorities at the FDA and placed additional stress on the handling of routine functions, such as biosimilar reviews and approvals.
The public comment period on the FDA's user fee calculation methodology closed in May. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America trade organization called for broader clarity and disclosure on resource allocation within the agency.
In the public meeting on Monday, FDA officials expressed faith in the revised system of resource need determination and said such changes are overdue. Having the ability to see what lies ahead is crucial, Barton said. “We really need to get ahead of the curve and understand what’s happening in the industry and how that is likely to translate into regulatory submissions and work for the agency over roughly 2 to 3 years."
The FDA had net PDUFA collections of $1.015 billion in fiscal year 2019. That same year, Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA) collections amounted to $35 million. Previously, CPA has been applied only to Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) money, but on an interim basis only. CPA was not used for BsUFA revenues. That changes under the new arrangement.
Senators Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Protect Skinny Labeling
January 2nd 2025To close out the year, 4 senators came together to introduce a new bipartisan bill to protect biosimilar and generic drug manufacturers from patent litigation when obtaining “skinny label” approvals for their products.
Biosimilars in America: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Impact
July 21st 2024Join us as we explore the complexities of the US biosimilars market, discussing legislative influences, payer and provider adoption factors, and strategies to overcome industry challenges with expert insights from Kyle Noonan, PharmD, MS, value & access strategy manager at Cencora.
Top 5 Most-Read Regulatory Articles of 2024
December 25th 2024In 2024, significant biosimilar approvals were granted by the American and European regulatory agencies, including the first interchangeability designations for biosimilars referencing ustekinumab, adalimumab, denosumab, and aflibercept, marking key regulatory milestones in improving patient access to cost-effective treatments.
Exploring the Biosimilar Horizon: Julie Reed's Predictions for 2024
February 18th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, Julie Reed, executive director of the Biosimilars Forum, returns to discuss her predictions for the biosimilar industry for 2024 and beyond as well as the impact that the Forum's 4 new members will have on the organization's mission.
Eye on Pharma: Golimumab Biosimilar Update; Korea Approves Denosumab; Xbrane, Intas Collaboration
December 10th 2024Alvotech and Advanz Pharma have submitted a European marketing application for their golimumab biosimilar to treat inflammatory diseases, while Celltrion secured Korean approval for denosumab biosimilars, and Intas Pharmaceuticals partnered with Xbrane Biopharma on a nivolumab biosimilar.
Commercial Payer Coverage of Biosimilars: Market Share, Pricing, and Policy Shifts
December 4th 2024Researchers observe significant shifts in payer preferences for originator vs biosimilar products from 2017 to 2022, revealing growing payer interest in multiple product options, alongside the increasing market share of biosimilars, which contributed to notable reductions in both average sales prices and wholesale acquisition costs.