The improved efficacy of a biologic drug in combination with a conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been well demonstrated, but some biologic-naive patients are unable to tolerate drugs such as methotrexate. Limited data are available about which biologic to select for monotherapy in such patients, however.
The improved efficacy of a biologic drug in combination with a conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been well demonstrated, but some biologic-naive patients are unable to tolerate drugs such as methotrexate. Limited data are available about which biologic to select for monotherapy in such patients, however.
A recently published analysis, appearing in BMJ Open, used data from the Administrative Healthcare Database of Italy’s Lombardy region, as part of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases (RECORD) study, to comparatively evaluate the persistence of treatment on different biologics used in monotherapy compared with combination therapy.
Click to read more about monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis.
Patients with RA in the RECORD study were assessed to identify 799 patients who had at least 1 delivery of a first-line biologic as monotherapy, and 3679 patients who received combination therapy in the first line. Biologics used included abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab. Rituximab was excluded due to local limitations on use. Monotherapy was associated with longer disease duration, hepatic and renal disease, heart failure, lower use of steroids, and lower use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Combination therapy has been shown in many studies to be associated with a 21% lower risk of drug failure, but among those who received monotherapy, considering etanercept as a reference point, the adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for biologic failure was 1.28 for adalimumab (95% CI, 1.03-1.59) and 2.41 for infliximab (95% CI, 1.85-3.15). Abatacept was associated with a reduced through not statistically significant risk of failure, and tocilizumab was approximately equal with etanercept. Among combination therapies, only infliximab was statistically inferior to etanercept monotherapy.
The authors of the analysis write that, while monotherapy is commonly observed, it is important to better understand the factors that drive monotherapy, such as comorbidities, body mass index, and higher disease activity.
The authors conclude that using biologics with conventional therapy is preferable to monotherapy, and further state that etanercept monotherapy should be preferred to infliximab and adalimumab when first-line monotherapy is necessary.
Reference
Silvagni E, Bortoluzzi A, Carrara G. Comparative effectiveness of first-line biological monotherapy use in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study on health care administrative databases. BMJ Open.2018;8(9):e021447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021447.
Breaking Down Biosimilar Barriers: Interchangeability
November 14th 2024Part 3 of this series for Global Biosimilars Week, penned by Dracey Poore, director of biosimilars at Cardinal Health, explores the critical topic of interchangeability, examining its role in shaping biosimilar adoption and the broader implications for accessibility.
Biosimilars Development Roundup for October 2024—Podcast Edition
November 3rd 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the GRx+Biosims conference, which included discussions on data transparency, artificial intelligence (AI), and collaboration to enhance the global supply chain for biosimilars and generic drugs, as well as the evolving requirements for biosimilar devices.
Overcoming Challenges to Improve Access and Reduce Costs
November 12th 2024Biosimilars hold the potential to dramatically lower health care costs and improve access to life-changing treatments, but realizing this potential will require urgent policy reforms, market competition, and better education for both providers and patients.
Biosimilars Policy Roundup for September 2024—Podcast Edition
October 6th 2024On this episode of Not So Different, we discuss the FDA's approval of a new biosimilar for treating retinal conditions, which took place in September 2024 alongside other major industry developments, including ongoing legal disputes and broader trends in market dynamics and regulatory challenges.
Challenges, Obstacles, and Future Directions for Anti-TNF Biosimilars in IBD
November 9th 2024A review article on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) outlined current use of anti-TNF originators and biosimilars, their efficacy and safety, the benefits and challenges of biosimilars, and the future of biosimilars in IBD.
Skyrizi Overtakes Humira: “Product Hopping” Leaves Biosimilar Market in Limbo
November 7th 2024For the first time, Skyrizi (risankizumab-rzaa) has replaced Humira (reference adalimumab) as AbbVie’s sales driver, largely due to companies encouraging “product hopping” to avoid competition, creating concerns for the sustainability of the burgeoning adalimumab biosimilar market.